Effusion Question about Uranium enrichening

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effusion Uranium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of passages needed to achieve a uranium isotope purity of less than 1% contamination using Graham's Law of Effusion. The initial calculation suggested a need for approximately 9840 passages, but further analysis indicated that the fluorine atoms' mass must be included in the calculations. After correcting the approach, the ratio of isotopes per passage was recalculated, leading to a revised estimate of about 1151 passages to achieve the desired purity. The importance of accurately accounting for all components in the effusion process was emphasized. Ultimately, the participant confirmed the accuracy of their final answer after addressing rounding errors.
CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


A gas with equal number densities of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) molecules containing two isotopes of uranium, atomic masses 235amu and 238amu, is passed through a porous membrane containing very small holes. Use Graham's Law of Effusion to calculate:

How many successive passages through similar membranes would be needed to produce one isotope contaminated by less than 1% of the other isotope?


Homework Equations


Grahams' Law: $$\frac{v_x}{v_y} = \sqrt{\frac{m_y}{m_x}}$$


The Attempt at a Solution


So we want ##v_x > 99##%## v_y##. I calculated that per passage, ## v_x## is greater than ##v_y## by about 1.006. Then I divided this by 100 to get the percentage increase and divided this by 99. This gives about 9840. I think the correct answer is about 1070.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two passes mean 1.0062.
 
CAF123 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So we want ##v_x > 99##%## v_y##. I calculated that per passage, ## v_x## is greater than ##v_y## by about 1.006. Then I divided this by 100 to get the percentage increase and divided this by 99. This gives about 9840. I think the correct answer is about 1070.

Many thanks.
For starters, have you considered the fluorine atoms' mass in your calculation? (It appears that you haven't)

Also, the 1.006 figure (or whatever you actually get after you account for the fluorine) is a ratio. Simply dividing it by 100 is not a way to get a percent. Instead, let me ask you this: if 1.006 is the isotope ratio after passing through one membrane, how would you calculate the ratio after passing through two membranes?

(Hint: see Borek's post :smile:)
 
Redbelly98 said:
For starters, have you considered the fluorine atoms' mass in your calculation? (It appears that you haven't)

In that case, per passage, the ratio would be $$\sqrt{\frac{238 + 19(6)}{235 + 19(6)}}$$

Also, the 1.006 figure (or whatever you actually get after you account for the fluorine) is a ratio. Simply dividing it by 100 is not a way to get a percent. Instead, let me ask you this: if 1.006 is the isotope ratio after passing through one membrane, how would you calculate the ratio after passing through two membranes?

(1.004)2, where 1.004 is the new ratio I calculated.

EDIT: From your advice, I have:
We want the ratio of isotopes to be such that there is (in fact more than) 99 times more than the other. So we find ##n## such that ##(1.004)^n > 99 \Rightarrow n ## is roughly 1151. Is this correct?
EDIT2: I get the required answer by not making rounding errors. Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Glad it worked out. :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top