Eigenvalue Problem: Find All Eigen-Values & Eigen-Fns

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



find all eigen-values and eigen-functions for the initial boundary value problem:

$$x^2y''+xy'-\lambda y=0$$
Boundary Conditions:
$$y(1)=y(e)=0$$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



i just wanted to know if my substitution in the Auxiliary equation is valid or not, i don't see why not but it's not what the book had.

r4iEBrk.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing methods for two different types of differential equations.. [itex]l^2+ l- \lambda= 0[/itex] is the characteristic equation for the differential equation [itex]y''+ y'- \lambda= 0[/itex] with constant coefficients. This is an "equipotential equation" where each derivative is multiplied by x to a power equal to the degree of the derivative. It has a completely different characteristic equation.

Looking for a solution of the form [itex]y= Cx^n[/itex], [itex]y'= Cnx^{n-1}[/itex] and [itex]y''= Cn(n- 1)x^{n-2}[/itex]. Putting that into the equation gives [itex]x^2(n(n-1)Cx^{n-2})+ x(nCx^{n-1})- \lambda (Cx^n)= n(n-1)Cx^n+ nCx^n- \lambda Cn= (n(n- 1)+ n- \lambda)x^n= 0[/itex]. In order for this to be 0 for all x, we must have [itex]n(n-1)+ n- \lambda= 0[/itex]. That is the characteristic equation for this problem.

(Equivalently, the substitution [tex]t= ln(x)[/tex] converts an "equipotential equation" in x to an equation with constant coefficients in t.)
 
iScience said:

Homework Statement



find all eigen-values and eigen-functions for the initial boundary value problem:

$$x^2y''+xy'-\lambda y=0$$
Boundary Conditions:
$$y(1)=y(e)=0$$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



i just wanted to know if my substitution in the Auxiliary equation is valid or not, i don't see why not but it's not what the book had.

r4iEBrk.png
As HallsofIvy has suggested: your auxiliary equation does not apply, because the LHS of your DE does not have constant coefficients. When they are functions of x, all bets are off. It is very important that you grasp this fact!
 
Last edited:
It might help you to understand how you can tell what you tried doesn't work. In your approach, you're assuming the solution has the form ##y=e^{mx}## where ##m## is a constant. You are free, of course, to try this, but it could lead to non-sensical results. If it does, you have to find a different method of solving the equation.

If you had solved the resulting quadratic correctly, you should have gotten ##m x = -\frac 12 \pm \frac 12 \sqrt{1+4\lambda}##. Isolating ##m##, you find it depends on ##x## and is not a constant, but you had assumed it was a constant. You've reached a contradiction, which indicates that your initial assumption was not valid.