Eigenvalues/vectors diagonalization

  • Thread starter Thread starter emyt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagonalization
Click For Summary
A matrix A with two distinct eigenvalues, λ1 and λ2, where the dimension of the eigenvector space for λ1 is n - 1, is proven to be diagonalizable. The existence of n - 1 independent eigenvectors for λ1, along with one for λ2, results in n independent eigenvectors overall. This set of eigenvectors forms a basis for the vector space, allowing the matrix to be represented as a diagonal matrix. The discussion also touches on the relationship between diagonalizability and the multiplicity of eigenvalues, questioning how to determine multiplicity without the characteristic polynomial. Understanding these concepts is crucial for proving diagonalizability in linear algebra.
emyt
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that A \in Mnxn(F) has two distinct eigenvalues \lambda_{1} and \lambda_{2} and that dim(E_{\lambda_{1}}) = n - 1. Prove that A is diagonalizable

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


hmm, I'm not sure.. how would I start this?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the dimension of the eigenvector space corresponding to eigenvalue \lambda_1 is n- 1, then there are n-1 independent eigenvectors corresponding to \lambda_1

That, together with an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue \lambda_2 gives you n independent vectors (eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are always independent) and form a basis for the vector space. The matrix for the linear transformation, written in that basis, is a diagonal matrix having \lambda_1 n-1 times on the main diagonal and \lambda_2 once.
 
thanks, I was thinking about that too, but for some reason my mind strayed and thought that I would need 2n independent vectors..
I was also looking at a couple of the diagonal "if and only if" theorems. I saw a couple that might've been useful, like:
T is diagonalizable if and only if the multiplicity of\lambda is equal to dim(E_{\lambda}).
And now I have to ask: how can you deduce the multiplicity of an eigenvalue without working out the characteristic polynomial and looking at the multiplicity of the factors?
thanks :)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
33K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K