How do I handle degenerate eigenvalues and eigenvectors in quantum mechanics?

M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
In Quantum, I ran across the eigenvalue problem.
They gave me a matrix, and i was asked to find eigenvalues and then eigenvectors.
But the eigenvalues, were degenerate and thus i couldn't find the exact normalized eigenvector.
What to do in this case? Shoukd i choose arbitrary values?

My other question is about another problem, they gave me a matrix and i got no degenrate eigenvakues, anyway when i wanted to find eigenvector, i tried normalizing it, so i got let's say:
y^2=4 so y=±2

What do i choose? Does it make a difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M. next said:
In Quantum, I ran across the eigenvalue problem.
They gave me a matrix, and i was asked to find eigenvalues and then eigenvectors.
But the eigenvalues, were degenerate and thus i couldn't find the exact normalized eigenvector.
What to do in this case? Shoukd i choose arbitrary values?

My other question is about another problem, they gave me a matrix and i got no degenrate eigenvakues, anyway when i wanted to find eigenvector, i tried normalizing it, so i got let's say:
y^2=4 so y=±2

What do i choose? Does it make a difference?

There is no unique eigenvector corresponding to degenerate eigenvalues. Instead, all the vectors in a subspace of dimension equal to the degeneracy can be its eigenvectors. Non-degenerate eigenvalue is really a special case where that dimension is 1. In case of degeneracy, you are free to choose any vectors in the eigenspace in forming a basis, it doesn't matter, but by convention, you choose orthonormal vectors with simple coordinates.

This also answers your 2nd question, if it has no degeneracy, you are choosing an orthonormal basis in 1D, but you still have freedom to choose its direction. In general, you can multiply a ket with unitary complex number without changing its physical significance.
 
Thanks you a lot
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top