Graduate Eigenvectors and matrix inner product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a matrix \( A \) form a Hilbert space, specifically \( L^2[a,b] \). The inner product formula \( \int x(t)\overline{y(t)} dt \) is proposed for use with eigenvectors \( [x_1,y_1] \) and \( [x_2,y_2] \). It is established that if the original vector space has an inner product, the eigenspaces corresponding to different eigenvalues will also possess an inner product, confirming that the matrix eigenvectors indeed form a Hilbert space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces and Hilbert spaces.
  • Knowledge of complex functions and their properties.
  • Basic concepts from functional analysis, particularly from Kreyszig's "Functional Analysis".
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert spaces in detail, focusing on \( L^2[a,b] \).
  • Learn about the direct sum of eigenspaces and their implications in linear algebra.
  • Explore the application of inner products in complex vector spaces.
  • Review Kreyszig's "Functional Analysis" for deeper insights into inner product spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra and functional analysis, particularly those interested in the properties of eigenvectors and their applications in Hilbert spaces.

SeM
Hi, I am trying to prove that the eigevalues, elements, eigenfunctions or/and eigenvectors of a matrix A form a Hilbert space. Can one apply the inner product formula :

\begin{equation}
\int x(t)\overline y(t) dt
\end{equation}

on the x and y coordinates of the eigenvectors [x_1,y_1] and [x_2,y_2], x_1 and y_1 and x_2 and y_2:\begin{equation}
\int x_1\overline y_1 dt
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\int x_2\overline y_2 dt
\end{equation}and by that prove that the inner product of the matrix vectors is complete and therefore forms a Hilbert space L² [a,b] ?

The reason I am asking about this is because I am looking for a way to prove that the matrix elements, its vectors and its solution is/are Hilbert space, L^2[a,b]

The solution is in general form:

\begin{equation}
\psi = \alpha v_1 e^{\lambda_1t}+\alpha v_2 e^{\lambda_2t}
\end{equation}

where v_1 and v_2 are the eigenvectors of the matrix. In Kreyszig Functional Analysis, p 132, he says "In example 2.2-7 the functions were assumed to be real-valued. In certain cases, that restriction can be removed, to consider complex valued functions. These function form a vector space, which becomes an inner product space if we define:

\begin{equation}
\int x(t)\overline y(t) dt
\end{equation}

This gives also the complex norm.

\begin{equation}
\int \big(|x(t)|^2dt \big)^{1/2}
\end{equation}

And then Kreyszig ends with "The completion of the metric space corresponding to the inner product for the complex matrix (which I just gave above) is the real space L^2[a,b] .

I would like to prove that "my" matrix satisfies this condition too. So , because the general solution given above does not explicitly show that it satisfies the inner product, can I use the eigenvectors in the inner product formula to conclude that the matrix eigenvectors form a Hilbert space?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are confusing various things here. Given a matrix ##A## and an eigenvalue ##\lambda##, such that ##A.\vec{v}=\vec{v}## then ##\vec{v}## spans of course a vector space. For different eigenvalues, you can use the direct product of those eigenspaces. These will have an inner product if the original vector space has. There is nothing to show here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K