Einstein Elevator: Time Dilation Questions Answered

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephanus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Elevator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time dilation as illustrated by Einstein's elevator thought experiment. Participants explore the implications of gravitational effects on time perception between different heights, particularly focusing on the differences experienced by a person's head and feet in both gravitational and accelerating frames. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects of general relativity (GR) and special relativity (SR), as well as calculations related to gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether their head would be older than their feet in the context of the Einstein elevator, given that there is no gravity in that scenario.
  • Another participant notes that the gravitational force at the feet is slightly greater than at the head due to tidal effects, which complicates the equivalence principle.
  • It is suggested that the difference in time rate between the head and feet is related to gravitational potential rather than the difference in gravitational force experienced.
  • Calculations are presented regarding the gravitational acceleration experienced at different heights, with one participant expressing uncertainty about their calculations.
  • Participants discuss the implications of acceleration on time rates, questioning whether this relates to GR or SR concepts.
  • There is mention of using more accurate values for gravitational constants to improve calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravitational force, potential, and time dilation. While some agree on the importance of potential in determining time differences, others raise questions about the applicability of the equivalence principle and the effects of acceleration. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider tidal effects and the differences in gravitational acceleration when discussing time dilation. There is also mention of the complexities involved in calculating gravitational effects based on varying heights and locations on Earth.

Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Dear PF Forum,
I have a question regarding Einstein Elevator, which I believe there are many topics about this. But I haven't got the answer.
I've watched some youtube video or read about it, I forgot. That our head is wiser than our foot, because time slow for our foot.
Okay..., this could have been something in GR formula. My feet is at 6200 km from the Earth center and my head is at 6200 + 1.7m. Even in Newton gravity formula my head wouldn't feel 9.8m/s2. Perhaps 9.7999999 something m/s2?
Now in Einstein elevator. Would our head be older than our feet? Since there's no gravity there.
And our head would be accelerated 9.8 m/s2 just as our feet?
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot to add another paragraph.
I ask this because I remember that in Einstein elevator, if someone one the top floor shine a light bulb, the receiver from the bottom receives slightly more signal than a receiver from the top.
Would the effect happens EXACTLY as on earth?
Thank you very much.
This is the question that I'd like to know actually.
 
Stephanus said:
Would the effect happens EXACTLY as on earth?
No, not quite exactly. And the reason is what you identified in your first thread, that the gravitational force at you feet is very slightly greater than at your head. That is a tidal effect.

The equivalence principle that says being in an accelerating elevator is like being in a gravitational field only applies when tidal effects are small enough to ignore.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
Stephanus said:
My feet is at 6200 km from the Earth center and my head is at 6200 + 1.7m. Even in Newton gravity formula my head wouldn't feel 9.8m/s2. Perhaps 9.7999999 something m/s2?
Yes, and it's worth taking a moment to calculate roughly what the difference might be.

Now in Einstein elevator. Would our head be older than our feet? Since there's no gravity there.
And our head would be accelerated 9.8 m/s2 just as our feet?
in the elevator, both your head and your feet will accelerate at the exact same rate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus
Stephanus said:
Dear PF Forum,
I have a question regarding Einstein Elevator, which I believe there are many topics about this. But I haven't got the answer.
I've watched some youtube video or read about it, I forgot. That our head is wiser than our foot, because time slow for our foot.
Okay..., this could have been something in GR formula. My feet is at 6200 km from the Earth center and my head is at 6200 + 1.7m. Even in Newton gravity formula my head wouldn't feel 9.8m/s2. Perhaps 9.7999999 something m/s2?
Now in Einstein elevator. Would our head be older than our feet? Since there's no gravity there.
And our head would be accelerated 9.8 m/s2 just as our feet?
Thank you very much.

The thing to keep in mind is that the difference between time rate of your head and your feet is not related to the difference in g force they experience, but to the difference in potential, or how much work it would take to move a test mass from one point to another. Since g force falls off with height on the Earth, you would have to figure that in when determining the difference in potential and the time difference for the person standing on Earth. On the other hand, for the person in the elevator, g-force does not fall off between feet. In other words, it would take more energy to lift a test mass from floor to head height in the Elevator than it would on the Earth, and thus the time rate difference in the elevator would be the greater of the two.
 
Thank you very much
Nugatory said:
Stephanus said:
...My feet is at 6200 km from the Earth center and my head is at 6200 + 1.7m. Even in Newton gravity formula my head wouldn't feel 9.8m/s2. Perhaps 9.7999999 something m/s2?
Yes, and it's worth taking a moment to calculate roughly what the difference might be...
Okay...
The Earth radius from equator is 6378.1 km, let's call it r
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth
or 6378.100m

This is what makes me irritated. I'm calculating 1.7 m against a 0.1 km rounding. But, I'll do it anyway
I live in Jakarta 6° 8'59.61"S 106°42'9.06"E (Google Earth)
Frankly I can't calculate how far I'm from the center of the earth, considering I'm not exactly in the equator, but closely enough. More over, I don't know how high my house from the sea level. Heck, even my house is some 50cm higher than the road in front of it. But, I'll do it anyway.

First of all, the gravitational constant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant
6.674 * 10-11 * N * m2/kg2 let's call it G

The mass of the earth: 5.97237×1024 kg, let's call it M
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth

So the force of gravity, let's call it F for me (my feet) and Earth from 6378.km is...
##F = G \frac{M * \text{my weight} * kg }{r^2}## not that I don't want to disclose my weight :smile:. But surely the staffs/mentors who read this will understand why M2 is not important :smile:
##F = 6.674 * 10^{-11} N * \frac{m^{2}}{kg^2} \frac{5.97237 * 10 ^ {24}\text{kg} * \text{my weight} * kg}{6378100^2 m^2}##
##F = 9.80627 * N * \frac{m^{2}}{kg^2} * \frac{1 \text{ kg} * \text{my weight} kg}{m^2}##
##F = 9.80627 * N * \text{my weight}##
So, this is the force that is needed to keep me standing on the ground.
How much acceleration is experienced for an object as heavy as me if applied this number of force?
Because force is mass * acceleration, and Newton is in Kg * m / t2, or F = m * a, a =F/m, so...
##a = \frac{9.80627 * kg * \frac{m}{t^2} * \text{my weight}}{\text{my weight } kg}##
##a = 9.80627 * \frac{m}{t^2}##
So, this is the acceleration that is felt by my feet.
What is the acceleration felt by my head?
I don't have to go through all the calculation above, just this one
##F = ... \frac{...}{(r+1.7m)^2}##
##a_{head} = 9.80627 * \frac{6378100^2}{6378101.7^2}##
##a_{head} = 9.806264773##
##a_{feet} = 9.80627##
I don't know if my calculation is correct.
Thanks for the attentions.
 
Janus said:
The thing to keep in mind is that the difference between time rate of your head and your feet is not related to the difference in g force they experience, but to the difference in potential, or how much work it would take to move a test mass from one point to another.
So..., the time rate differs depending on acceleration. No gravity involved?
Is this GR or SR concept?

Janus said:
Since g force falls off with height on the Earth, you would have to figure that in when determining the difference in potential and the time difference for the person standing on Earth. On the other hand, for the person in the elevator, g-force does not fall off between feet. In other words, it would take more energy to lift a test mass from floor to head height in the Elevator than it would on the Earth, and thus the time rate difference in the elevator would be the greater of the two.
Just for an instant I thought Einstein elevator has anything to do with Bell's Paradox. But it's not, right. Because in Bell's Paradox, the distance wrt a rest observer stays the same, though there's acceleration involved.
 
Janus said:
For better accuracy, you can use 3.986004414e14 for GM, for which we actually have a more accurate value than for either G or M separately.
Ok, thanks. Then we only need to calculate distance only.
 
  • #10
Stephanus said:
So..., the time rate differs depending on acceleration. No gravity involved?
Is this GR or SR concept?

The time rate differs by the difference in potential. On the Earth that difference is due to gravity, in the elevator it is due to acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
927
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K