Einstein Eq. & Stiffness of Spacetime

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sonderval
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Stiffness
Sonderval
Messages
234
Reaction score
11
Looking at the Einstein equation, stresses can cause a deformation of space time.
This link here
https://twitter.com/anilananth/status/339030628181868544
gives a value for the elastic modulus ("stiffness") of spacetime.
I think that the value of 10^24GPa must be related to Einstein's constant 8 pi G/c^4 - I suspect that one uses the equations for a small perturbation of flat spacetime (as Misner Thorne Wheeler, eq. 18.8b) to calculate this, but I don't see how it is done exactly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be helpful to have a source with more detail than twitter.
 
Yes it would, but that's all I have found...
 
I think this is just an example of the party game, Planck Scale Fun.

Take any physical quantity (pressure, say). Out of the Planck Mass, Length and Time, construct a unit with those dimensions. Then marvel about how large/small that unit is. :wink:
 
But isn't there a physical meaning to it?
After all, the rhs of the linearised Einstein equation contains a stress (in the T_ij-part of the tensor), the lhs a change in the metric (which is similar to an elastic strain, it is a chenge of length relative to a length).
So I think it should be posisble to re-write things in a way similar to Hooke's law - at least that is what I thought when I read "stiffness of space". Or is this too simplistic?
 
OK, more seriously.. This guy Anil Ananthaswamy is not a scientist, he's a popular science writer. Even if he had a valid point to make, Twitter is not the place of choice to publish it, I think! :eek:

Secondly, isn't it just a naming coincidence - the "stress" Tij in Einstein's Equation is the stress in a material body, not some stress being applied to spacetime. And the "strain" hμν generally results from T00 rather than Tij. Also it is a nonlocal effect - stress here produces strain over there.

There always have been attempts to imagine spacetime as some kind of elastic medium. I know when our class first learned about the dragging of inertial frames near a rotating body, we used to joke about calculating the "Viscosity of Free Space". :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
@Bill_K
So even in this interpretation it is matter being stressed that causes a "strain" (change in the metric), but it is not spacetime that is "stressed" in any way.

"There always have been attempts to imagine spacetime as some kind of elastic medium."
I found this, for example
[crackpot link deleted]
Is this kind of approach meaningful?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That approach is in a crackpot journal. So it's unlikely that this kind of approach is meaningful.

Given that we have one source from twitter, one source from a crackpot journal, and nothing else, I have to conclude that this idea is not part of the scientific mainstream, so does not fit the PF mission. (To be fair, I think a better description is that we have something too vague to discuss)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Back
Top