Einstein-Hilbert action.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Klaus_Hoffmann
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Einstein-Hilbert action can yield the Einstein field equations by independently varying the metric and Christoffel symbols. It is confirmed that this approach is valid within the Palatini formulation of General Relativity (GR). In this formulation, varying the action with respect to the connection leads to the conclusion that the connection must equal the Levi-Civita connection. Consequently, this allows for the recovery of the standard metric-only Einstein-Hilbert action, demonstrating the classical equivalence of the two methods. This exploration highlights the nuances of different formulations of GR and their implications for gravitational theories.
Klaus_Hoffmann
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
if we have the Einstein Hilbert action

I= \int_{V} dV (-g)^{1/2}R or I= \int_{V} dV \mathcal L (g_{ab}, \Gamma_{kl}^{i}

then my question is if we can obtain Einstein equations by varying the metric and Christofell symbols independently i mean you get Einstein Field equations by

\frac{\delta I}{\delta g_{ab} =0 \frac{\delta I}{\delta \Gamma_{kl}^{i} =0

i mean , you consider the metric g_{ab} and \Gamma_{kl}^{i} as independent variables for your theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Klaus_Hoffmann said:
if we have the Einstein Hilbert action

I= \int_{V} dV (-g)^{1/2}R or I= \int_{V} dV \mathcal L (g_{ab}, \Gamma_{kl}^{i}

then my question is if we can obtain Einstein equations by varying the metric and Christofell symbols independently i mean you get Einstein Field equations by

\frac{\delta I}{\delta g_{ab} =0 \frac{\delta I}{\delta \Gamma_{kl}^{i} =0

i mean , you consider the metric g_{ab} and \Gamma_{kl}^{i} as independent variables for your theory.

Yes, this is done in the so-called Palatini fromulation of GR. Google it to find more information. (if the action is simply the EH action, the Palatini formulation gives the same result as the usual metric approach. If the action is generalized to included other terms (liek a 1/R term as is done in some modedl of the so-called f(R) gravity, the Palatini formulation gives a different result than th emetric formulation.)

Patrick
 
Yes, if you vary the metric+connection EH action with respect to the connection, you find the algebraic equation: connection=levi-civita connection. Thus you can insert these equations of motion inside the action, recovering the metric-only EH action, and the two are classically equivalent.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
132
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
933
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top