Einstein Notation - Not sure if my answers are right

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around problems related to Einstein notation, specifically focusing on questions 11 and 12. Participants are exploring the implications of index notation in tensor calculus and its application in various mathematical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the correct application of indices in their equations, particularly regarding the number of times an index can appear. There is also a focus on understanding the implications of certain mathematical expressions, such as the relationship between partial derivatives and the Kronecker delta.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance regarding the use of the product rule and the properties of the Kronecker delta. There is ongoing exploration of the correctness of specific answers, particularly in part 12(d), with some uncertainty expressed about the interpretation of results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also a noted confusion regarding whether certain expressions imply summation.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Questions 11 and 12 specifically..
29dzc43.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


11(a)
e7ze36.png


11(b)
2hhkp35.png


12(a)
2rhrxp1.png


12(b)
34pgaad.png

oky1lf.png


12(c)
2vdi8o7.png

mslys6.png


12(d)
35k4wme.png

ru9svs.png


(I did the last part of 12(d) by normal vector methods and got 2a instead...which is the correct answer)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
An index shouldn't appear more than twice. For the first one, for example, you should have
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial r_i} (r_j r_j)^{n/2}$$
 
vela said:
An index shouldn't appear more than twice. For the first one, for example, you should have
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial r_i} (r_j r_j)^{n/2}$$

Thanks for your reply!

Also, I can't see what's wrong with my final answer in part 12(d)...i think the last line is the cross product of ∂j and r which equates to zero??

I think I have figured out every question other than part 12(d)
 
Last edited:
Hint: ##\partial_i r_j = \delta_{ij}##. You can use that in several of the problems. In 12b, you need to use the product rule.
 
vela said:
Hint: ##\partial_i r_j = \delta_{ij}##.

thanks i think I've sorted it out!
 
unscientific said:
what does this mean? is it a vector or a scalar? summation implied or not?
It is not a summation. It is just the statement that the partial of the jth coordinate function with respect to the ith coordinate function is just the kronecker delta.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K