Einstein Tensor Divergence Proof: How to Show it is Divergence-Free?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter teddd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Tensor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the Einstein tensor is divergence-free, focusing on the mathematical steps involved in the proof, particularly the manipulation of indices and the application of the Bianchi identity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof and attempts to manipulate the Einstein tensor's divergence using the Ricci scalar and metric tensor.
  • Another participant points out that the index manipulations are incorrect, specifically mentioning that an index cannot be repeated more than twice.
  • A participant acknowledges understanding the Bianchi identity but seeks clarification on the mistake in their previous manipulation.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the summation convention and how it affects the clarity of index summation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the proof, and multiple views regarding index manipulation and the application of the Bianchi identity remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the clarity of index manipulation and the application of the summation convention, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.

teddd
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
I'm having a lillle problem proving that the einstein tensor is divergence free!
I don't know how to begin, i start with
\nabla_\mu G^{\mu\nu}=\nabla_{\mu}(R^ {\mu\nu} -\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R)
i tried to do \nabla_\mu G^{\mu\nu}=\nabla_{\mu}g^{\mu\nu}(g_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}R)
(by the way, is that right? I guess no becaouse then I get to g^{mu\nu}(\nabla_{\mu}(R-\frac{1}{2}R))=\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial R}{\partial \mu} which i guess never goes to zero!)can you help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You index manipulations are incorrect. You can't have an index repeated more than twice.

The way to get the divergence of the Einstein tensor is to start with the second Bianchi identity of the Riemann tensor, and then contract the upper index with one of the lower ones.
 
Thanks pal, I had already figured the doubly contracted Bianchi identity thing out, but I wanted to know where was the mistake in that!

But why I can't repeat an index more than twice? I guess becaouse it clashes against the summation convention isnt'it?
 
Yes. In that case, it's not clear over which indices you should sum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
943
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K