Einsteinian Time vs Newtonian Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter seeldoger47
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newtonian Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between Einsteinian and Newtonian time, emphasizing the coupling of time and space in Einstein's theory of relativity. Newtonian time is viewed as absolute and linear, while Einstein's interpretation suggests that time is relative and intertwined with the fabric of space. Recommended reading materials include "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking and "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" by Albert Einstein, which can be understood without delving into complex mathematics. These resources will aid in understanding the fundamental differences between the two concepts of time. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for exploring the notion of progress in relation to time perception.
seeldoger47
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm and English major and am writing a paper that argues our notion of progress stems from our linear perception of time. In order to make my argument I plan on citing Newtonian physics interpretation of time and then contrasting that with Einstein's interpretation of time. So can someone please explain (or point me in the direction of reading material that explains) the difference between the Einsteinian and Newtonian time?
Thanks in advanced!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The only important difference is the coupling of time and space.
That would be theory of relativity.
 
Useful reading material

A Brief History of Time from the Big Bang to Black holes by Stephen W. Hawking

and

Relativity
The Special and General Theory by Albert Einstein

(you can skip Maths)

ehild
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

A LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena
6
Replies
264
Views
21K
Admissions Seeking Feedback on my Physics Personal Statement for Uni Application
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Comparing Information Loss: Time Dilation vs. Decoherence
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Unlearning the Block Universe: How Relativity Challenges Our Perception of Time
2
Replies
90
Views
8K
A MOND Theory Primer: Stacy McGaugh's Research Program Explored
Replies
11
Views
4K
A Weyl tensor and coordinate acceleration
Replies
12
Views
2K
Animal sizes in low gravity environments
Replies
18
Views
3K
A Hidden Assumptions in Bell's Theorem?
7
Replies
333
Views
17K
W. Jason Morgan, First Plate Tectonist, Dies at 87
Replies
1
Views
1K
Question about time in QM vs. special relativity?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top