Einstein's original paper question

  • Thread starter 18t
  • Start date
  • #1
18t
1
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi, by reading the Einstein's original derivation of the E=mc2 formula (http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/), Einstein does an
approximation by neglecting higher order derivatives before arriving at
E=mc2. But, as far as I know, E equals mc2 precisely. Does anyone know why Einstein didnt derive the equation precisely? I tried to play with the paper a bit to make it spit out the precise equation but didnt have much luck-I must be overlooking something. Could someone help me with this one?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
329
0
18t said:
Hi, by reading the Einstein's original derivation of the E=mc2 formula (http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/), Einstein does an
approximation by neglecting higher order derivatives before arriving at
E=mc2. But, as far as I know, E equals mc2 precisely. Does anyone know why Einstein didnt derive the equation precisely? I tried to play with the paper a bit to make it spit out the precise equation but didnt have much luck-I must be overlooking something. Could someone help me with this one?
The Sep 1905 paper derivation has been long superseeded by the modern derivation that uses 4-vectors giving the general formula:

[tex]E^2-(pc)^2=(mc^2)^2[/tex]

For p=0 you obtain [tex]E=mc^2[/tex] exactly

The above can be written a little nicer if we take c=1:

[tex]<E,E>-<p,p>=m^2[/tex]

where <,> represents the dot product. In the proper frame of the object p is 0 therefore E=m
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Einstein's original paper question

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
786
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
Top