Elastic collision COR problem.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the coefficient of restitution (CR) in perfectly elastic collisions, which is defined as CR = (v2 - v1) / (u1 - u2). It is established that in elastic collisions, the relative speed of approach equals the relative speed of separation, leading to the conclusion that the coefficient of restitution is 1. This conclusion is derived from the principles of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy, demonstrating that the total kinetic energy remains conserved during the collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy principles
  • Familiarity with Newton's Third Law
  • Basic grasp of the coefficient of restitution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the coefficient of restitution in various types of collisions
  • Explore the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of collisions in physics simulations
  • Investigate real-world applications of elastic collisions in engineering and material science
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and energy conservation principles.

arteelibunao
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is e=1 for perfectly elastic collision?

How did they arrive with that? Any derivations? Thanks.

-Artee Libunao
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The coefficient of restitution is defined as
[tex]C_{R} = \frac{v_{2} - v_{1}}{u_{1} - u_{2}}[/tex]

For elastic collisions, it can shown from conservation of kinetic energy and conservation of momentum that relative speed of approach = relative speed of separation for the two objects colliding. Hence [tex]v_{2} - v_{1} = u_{1} - u_{2}[/tex]
 
arteelibunao said:
Why is e=1 for perfectly elastic collision?

How did they arrive with that? Any derivations?

If you think of the two colliding objects as a system, you realize that, in the absence of external forces (and the force arising in a collision is an internal one of the system), the system cannot accelerate: in any frame, the velocity of the center of mass must remain constant.

[tex]v_{CM} = \frac{{V_o M}}<br /> {{m + M}} + \frac{{v_o m}}<br /> {{m + M}} = \frac{{V_f M}}<br /> {{m + M}} + \frac{{v_f m}}<br /> {{m + M}}[/tex]

Another expression of the same is conservation of momentum:

[tex]p_o = V_o M + v_o m = V_f M + v_f m = p_f[/tex]

Or Newton's Third Law:

[tex]\begin{gathered}<br /> V_o M + v_o m = V_f M + v_f m_f \hfill \\<br /> v_o m - v_f m_f = V_f M - V_o M \hfill \\<br /> m(v_o - v_f ) = M(V_f - V_o ) \hfill \\<br /> m(v_f - v_o ) = - M(V_f - V_o ) \hfill \\<br /> m\Delta v = - M\Delta V \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered}[/tex]

and since collision time is the same for both objects:

[tex]\begin{gathered}<br /> m\Delta v/\Delta t = - M\Delta V/\Delta t \hfill \\<br /> ma = - MA \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered}[/tex]

But all this only tells you how the total effect, the total acceleration, is distributed between the two objects, not its magnitude (the equality would still be true if you multiply both sides by n). To learn this, you must rely on conservation of energy and distinguish different cases depending on the characterstics of the materials involved.

In a perfectly elastic collision (an almost ideal situation), the materials may deform but recover their original size thanks to restoring forces. Another way to say it: KE turns into Potential Energy ad back again into KE. Thus the total KE of the system is conserved:

[tex] \begin{gathered}<br /> V_o ^2 M + v_o ^2 m = V_f ^2 M + v_f ^2 m \hfill \\<br /> V_o ^2 M - V_f ^2 M = v_f ^2 m - v_o ^2 m \hfill \\<br /> M(V_o ^2 - V_f ^2 ) = m(v_f ^2 - v_o ^2 ) \hfill \\<br /> M(V_f ^2 - V_o ^2 ) = - m(v_f ^2 - v_o ^2 ) \hfill \\<br /> M(V_f - V_o )(V_f + V_o ) = - m(v_f - v_o )(v_f + v_o ) \hfill \\<br /> M\Delta V(V_f + V_o ) = - m\Delta v(v_f + v_o ) \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} [/tex]

If you look back to conservation of momentum, you realize that the left-hand terms of each side are the same and so you are left with:

[tex]\begin{gathered}<br /> V_f + V_o = v_f + v_o \hfill \\<br /> V_f - v_f = v_o - V_o \hfill \\<br /> V_f - v_f = - (V_o - v_o ) \hfill \\<br /> v_{rel}^{final} = - v_{rel}^{original} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} [/tex]

So in an elastic collision the relative velocity of separation is of the same module as the relative velocity of approach, just a different sign. In other words, the collision has "restituted" both objects to their original velocities, in terms of magnitude, i.e. the coefficient of restitution is 1:

[tex]v_{rel}^{final} = ev_{rel}^{original} \to CR = e = \frac{{v_{rel}^{final} }}<br /> {{v_{rel}^{original} }} = 1[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K