Elastic energy stored in a balloon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the elastic energy stored in a balloon filled with glass beads when it is squeezed, transforming from a spherical shape to a more flattened form. Participants explore the complexities of this problem, including material properties, deformation behavior, and the implications of different assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for help in calculating the elastic energy stored in a balloon when squeezed into a different shape.
  • Another participant questions whether the elasticity of the balloon material affects the energy calculation, suggesting that it likely does.
  • Some participants argue that the problem is ill-defined and may not yield a meaningful answer without clearer parameters.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the problem, including the need for a detailed kinematic and material stress analysis.
  • Participants discuss the importance of the packing response of the glass beads and the deformational behavior of the rubber in the analysis.
  • Suggestions are made to start with simpler assumptions, such as modeling the balloon as containing air instead of glass beads.
  • There are recommendations to develop strain energy equations and stress equilibrium equations for the rubber cover, considering the three-dimensional nature of the deformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and practicality of the problem, with some suggesting it may not be worth pursuing due to its complexity. There is no consensus on the best approach to take or the assumptions that should be made.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of the problem's definition and the assumptions that may need to be made regarding material properties and deformation behavior. The complexity of the interactions between the balloon material and the contents is acknowledged.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying material science, mechanical engineering, or anyone involved in research related to elastic materials and their behavior under stress.

Diana27
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a balloon filled with glass beads (exercise-stress ball). When I squeeze the balloon, it changes its shape. Let's assume the initial shape is a sphere with radius R0 and thickness h0 and the final shape is like a pancake (cylinder R1 + half torus R2 with thickness h1). Can you help me to calculate the elastic energy stored in the balloon once I squeeze the balloon, please. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think it will be the same regardless of the strength/elasticity of the balloon material, which you have not mentioned?
 
phinds said:
Do you think it will be the same regardless of the strength/elasticity of the balloon material, which you have not mentioned?

I do not think it will be the same, as I'm stretching the material. I'm assuming a rubber balloon material.
 
A first thought was that the energy stored in the material could be a simple function of surface area. However there is an easy counter-example. Consider a spherical rubber balloon enclosing an incompressible fluid such as water. Holding the rest of the balloon stationary, deflect a small patch of the balloon's surface tangentially. This requires an energy input but does not change either surface area of the balloon or enclosed volume.

So a complete solution will require either simplifying assumptions or a careful description of the deflection.
 
Diana27 said:
I do not think it will be the same, as I'm stretching the material. I'm assuming a rubber balloon material.
And do you think all rubber has the same elasticity/strength?
 
phinds said:
And do you think all rubber has the same elasticity/strength?
Yes
 
Diana27 said:
Yes
Then you would do well to do a bit more research.

Look, I'm asking you these leading question trying to get you to arrive at the obvious conclusion that your "problem statement" is so ill defined that it's approximately like asking "how high is up?" and expecting a meaningful answer.
 
Why are you interested in calculating the stored elastic energy in the membrane for this situation? You are talking about a pretty complicated kinematic and material stress analysis problem. Certainly, the details of the loading are going to be important, the packing response of the glass beads within the membrane is going to play a role, and the deformational behavior of the rubber to the kinematics of the local in-plane strain environment is going to be important. Modeling this problem properly would be very challenging, to say the least. The question is, is it really worth the effort?
 
jbriggs444 said:
A first thought was that the energy stored in the material could be a simple function of surface area. However there is an easy counter-example. Consider a spherical rubber balloon enclosing an incompressible fluid such as water. Holding the rest of the balloon stationary, deflect a small patch of the balloon's surface tangentially. This requires an energy input but does not change either surface area of the balloon or enclosed volume.

So a complete solution will require either simplifying assumptions or a careful description of the deflection.

This kind of assumptions are correct?:
upload_2016-6-20_16-36-3.png


Chestermiller said:
Why are you interested in calculating the stored elastic energy in the membrane for this situation? You are talking about a pretty complicated kinematic and material stress analysis problem. Certainly, the details of the loading are going to be important, the packing response of the glass beads within the membrane is going to play a role, and the deformational behavior of the rubber to the kinematics of the local in-plane strain environment is going to be important. Modeling this problem properly would be very challenging, to say the least. The question is, is it really worth the effort?

I should say It worth, it's part of a research I'm starting and I want to be sure that I'm handling this problem in a proper way.
Could you help me, how can I start?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-6-20_16-21-35.png
    upload_2016-6-20_16-21-35.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 776
  • upload_2016-6-20_16-22-13.png
    upload_2016-6-20_16-22-13.png
    8.6 KB · Views: 691
  • #10
This is a very complicated problem that has very little practical applicability. Are you sure that you want to work on this, given that there are many other simpler problems that have practical applicability?

I would start by developing the strain energy equation for the rubber as a function of the three principal stretches. The rubber deformations in your application may be large, so you can't use the small strain approximations to describe the rubber elasticity behavior, and you can't use a one dimensional version because the local deformations are going to be 3D.

The behavior the the glass bead gravel inside the ball is going to be complicated, so you can start out by researching the rheological behavior of non-consolidated granular solids.

Temporarily, before including the glass bead behavior in the model, you should consider assuming there is air inside. At least then the behavior of the material inside the ball would be simple to include. You can switch to granular beads later.

You also need to start formulating the stress equilibrium equations for the rubber cover, treating either as a membrane or a shell. A membrane is, of course easier to solve.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
This is a very complicated problem that has very little practical applicability. Are you sure that you want to work on this, given that there are many other simpler problems that have practical applicability?

I would start by developing the strain energy equation for the rubber as a function of the three principal stretches. The rubber deformations in your application may be large, so you can't use the small strain approximations to describe the rubber elasticity behavior, and you can't use a one dimensional version because the local deformations are going to be 3D.

The behavior the the glass bead gravel inside the ball is going to be complicated, so you can start out by researching the rheological behavior of non-consolidated granular solids.

Temporarily, before including the glass bead behavior in the model, you should consider assuming there is air inside. At least then the behavior of the material inside the ball would be simple to include. You can switch to granular beads later.

You also need to start formulating the stress equilibrium equations for the rubber cover, treating either as a membrane or a shell. A membrane is, of course easier to solve.

Thank you very much for your help, this information is helpful to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
26K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
13K