Electric Charge- why is the electron the negative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the historical decision to designate the electron as negatively charged, a convention established by Benjamin Franklin prior to the discovery of the electron. This choice, made without knowledge of the electron's existence, has led to ongoing confusion in electronics, where the movement of electrons creates a negative charge. Participants emphasize that the sign of the majority charge carrier is not critical for understanding electricity, suggesting that the convention is arbitrary and does not affect the fundamental principles of electrical phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrical concepts, including charge and current.
  • Familiarity with the historical context of electrical science, particularly Benjamin Franklin's contributions.
  • Knowledge of electron behavior in conductive materials.
  • Awareness of the implications of charge conventions in electronics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical development of electrical charge conventions.
  • Explore the role of charge carriers in semiconductor physics.
  • Learn about the impact of charge sign conventions on circuit design.
  • Investigate how different countries approach measurement systems, such as the metric system.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the historical and practical implications of charge conventions in electronics.

coffeebird
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Why wasn't the electron fixed with the 'positive' value? wouldn't that simplify a lot of issues with electronics problems, i mean, that way things wouldn't have to be all backwards. like, wherever the electrons go is becoming more negative, and whichever direction they are leaving is more positive...etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the convention was established before the electron was discovered. There was a 50-50 chance of getting it right.
 
Blame Benjamin Franklin.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Because the convention was established before the electron was discovered. There was a 50-50 chance of getting it right.


that's what i was thinking...and people do that a lot, just stick with a convention for its own sake ( like not switching to the metric system in the US)
 
I think it's important to realize that one choice of sign is no more "right" than another.
The sign of the majority charge carrier is an insignificant factor in understanding 'electricity'. Anyone who thinks it is of ant consequencr, can't be appreciating the topic in any depth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
576
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K