Electric Field and Force between two plates [homework question]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of electric fields and forces between two charged plates, specifically considering scenarios where one plate is earthed. Participants explore the implications of different voltage configurations and the relevance of charge signs in these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question how the voltage across the plates affects the electric field and force calculations. There is discussion about treating the problem as a general case and considering specific voltage values. Some participants explore the implications of grounding one plate and how it affects the electric field strength.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions made regarding voltage and charge distribution. Some guidance has been offered regarding the uniformity of the electric field and the relevance of position within the field, though no consensus has been reached on specific calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are references to assumptions about uniform charge density and the significance of zero potential in the context of electric fields. The discussion also touches on the implications of large distances between plates, which may affect the uniformity of the electric field.

Samurai44
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


*Is the a difference when calculating the electric field , or a force exerted on a charge between two plates , if the two plates were :
a) both plates are charged ( connected to a power source) ,
b) both plates are charged ( connected to a power source), but the negative plate is earthed , i.e 0 V.

*Do we consider the sign of the charge when calculating the electric field ?

Homework Equations


E=F/Q or F=EQ
E=V/d
F=e V/d

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
That blank attempt at the solution is somewhat bothersome. What's the voltage across the gap between the plates in either case?
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
That blank attempt at the solution is somewhat bothersome. What's the voltage across the gap between the plates in either case?
Im just asking a general question, not a specific problem ,, take any voltage you like
 
Well I should really treat this like a homework problem. So the question becomes, in case a (nongrounded) let's say it's -3 and +3V. Is the second case 0 and +3 or 0 and +6?
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Well I should really treat this like a homework problem. So the question becomes, in case a (nongrounded) let's say it's -3 and +3V. Is the second case 0 and +3 or 0 and +6?
exactly
i uploaded a pic as an example for the second case , how do find the the electric field strength , and force on the electron if it was ,lets say, at mid point between the plates ?
Untitled 1 .jpg

sorry for bad drawing though
 
Np, this is physics forum not art forum. If you look at your relevant equations, and then look at your picture, you have a voltage and a distance; you're looking for the electric field. You have the equation you need, with one (reasonable) assumption. First off, 2m is pretty large for a gap in capacitors, but it doesn't really matter, as long as we can assume that the length of the plates are long with respect to the gap, the field will be approximately uniform throughout the region between the plates. Then it's a matter of applying coloumbs law once you find the field. This will give you the force on the electron.

With our assumption, it doesn't matter if the electron was mid point, quarter way or pi/32 of the way through, the force would be (for all intensive purposes) the same.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Np, this is physics forum not art forum. If you look at your relevant equations, and then look at your picture, you have a voltage and a distance; you're looking for the electric field. You have the equation you need, with one (reasonable) assumption. First off, 2m is pretty large for a gap in capacitors, but it doesn't really matter, as long as we can assume that the length of the plates are long with respect to the gap, the field will be approximately uniform throughout the region between the plates. Then it's a matter of applying coloumbs law once you find the field. This will give you the force on the electron.

With our assumption, it doesn't matter if the electron was mid point, quarter way or pi/32 of the way through, the force would be (for all intensive purposes) the same.

oh lol i meant 2 cm ,nevermind ,,
so the position doesn't matter i see , what about if the electron was moving , for example from the negative plate to mid point ,, is it the same case ?
 
Essentially, yes. If you want to find out for sure. Assume uniform charge density on either plate, the integrate the field contribution from each dL along the length of the plate for some arbitrary point (x,y) (you only need to do this in 2d to meet your picture). If you do that for both plates, then apply superposition and sum the contributions from both plates for all points (x,y) you will see that all points are approximately the same, especially far from the edges.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Essentially, yes. If you want to find out for sure. Assume uniform charge density on either plate, the integrate the field contribution from each dL along the length of the plate for some arbitrary point (x,y) (you only need to do this in 2d to meet your picture). If you do that for both plates, then apply superposition and sum the contributions from both plates for all points (x,y) you will see that all points are approximately the same, especially far from the edges.
that explains ,thanks
when I learned about equipotentials , i got confused ..
so even if one plate was at 0V , the electric field strength stays constant at all points - (just to make sure)
 
  • #10
Yea, zero potential doesn't really mean anything. It's kind of like me saying that a block sitting on a table has 0 GPE or me saying that it has GPE mg(height of the table from the floor). Very analagous.
 
  • #11
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Yea, zero potential doesn't really mean anything. It's kind of like me saying that a block sitting on a table has 0 GPE or me saying that it has GPE mg(height of the table from the floor). Very analagous.
alright ,, thanks a lot for helping :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K