Electric field at centre of a hollow hemisphere shell.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of a hollow hemisphere shell, involving concepts from electrostatics and calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply a formula using spherical coordinates and differential elements but expresses uncertainty about a potential error in their calculations. They mention having reviewed their work multiple times without identifying the mistake.
  • Some participants question the treatment of the unit vector ##\hat{r}## in the integration process, suggesting that its direction may vary and should not be considered constant.
  • Others inquire about methods to properly handle the vector during integration and express a lack of confidence in their calculus skills.
  • One participant suggests using symmetry to determine the direction of the net electric field and focusing on the relevant components in that direction.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that they have consulted external sources that contradict their results, highlighting a potential misunderstanding or misapplication of the concepts involved.

uOEE
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


aPU0AKi.png


Homework Equations


CQssp2k.png

N5fF11a.png
'

The Attempt at a Solution



Please excuse the poor writing. I believe it should be legible enough, but if you have any questions, i'll clarify or rewrite it.

RdtZpbc.png


Please excuse the poor writing. I believe it should be legible enough, but if you have any questions, i'll clarify or rewrite it.

My steps for solving this was filling in the values into the formula given. Using a square differential element on the surface of the sphere, as well as spherical co-ordinates.

i'm sure i just have a small error somewhere in the math, but I'm not too sure where... I've redone the question 3 times.

These two sources, among others, show that my answer is wrong. Though I did my question differently, so i can't be sure where i went wrong.



http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~alexei-grigoriev/index_files/Homework2_solutions.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Looks like you treated the unit vector ##\hat{r}## as a constant vector when you pulled it out of the double integral. Does the direction of ##\hat{r}## vary as you integrate over the surface? If so, you cannot treat it as a constant vector.
 
How would I treat the vector? My apologies. Calculus is not my strong suit.
 
How would I go about doing that? Calculus is not my stop suit. And also, thanks for the help.
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Looks like you treated the unit vector ##\hat{r}## as a constant vector when you pulled it out of the double integral. Does the direction of ##\hat{r}## vary as you integrate over the surface? If so, you cannot treat it as a constant vector.
 
Use symmetry to see which direction the net E field will point. Then just work with the component of E that is in that direction. (Project your integrand into that direction.)
 
 
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K