Electric field between two parallel plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field and voltage between two parallel plates that stop an electron beam. The poster, a geology master's student, finds the problem challenging due to its reliance on physics concepts not typically covered in their field. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between electric fields, forces, and kinematics, guiding the poster to apply relevant formulas like F=Eq and E=σ/ε₀. They suggest using the work-energy theorem and kinematic equations to derive the necessary values for acceleration and electric field strength. The conversation highlights the interdisciplinary nature of physics and the necessity for geologists to engage with these concepts in their studies.
meher4real
Messages
65
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Can't find the solution for this problem.
Relevant Equations
Wish i do know the equation.
[New poster has been reminded to show their best efforts to work the schoolwork problem when starting a homework thread]

My question is : An electron beam with velocity vector v = (0; 0.6x10^8 ;0) m.s enters between two oppositely charged plates parallel to the xz plane.
- How large is the areal charge density on the plates when the electric field between the plates stop the beam at a distance of 10mm ?
- Determine the voltage for the plate spacing of 25mm ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please tell us what level course this is for and indicate your thoughts about how to solve this.
 
hutchphd said:
Please tell us what level course this is for and indicate your thoughts about how to solve this.
I study Mining of Mineral Resources (Geology-Master Degree)
- I think that the question is tricky because the majority of electric field type of questions i found on the internet mention the q charge and they're different from this problem.
 
Is this an assigned problem for a particular class? What tools can you bring? For instance what does the electric field look like between two charged parallel conducting plates?
 
I've tried with the equation a=q/EM => a=qU/md
But none of U or q is available.
 
meher4real said:
I study Mining of Mineral Resources (Geology-Master Degree)
- I think that the question is tricky because the majority of electric field type of questions i found on the internet mention the q charge and they're different from this problem.
What is the q charge for an electron? I am sure you can find that on the internet.

Maybe what you found on the internet is different, but the question is not tricky. Read the problem carefully. The electric field stops the beam. Make a drawing showing the electric field lines and the velocity of a single moving electron in the beam. Whatever one electron does, all the electrons in the beam do.

The real trick is in asking the right questions that will lead you to the answer. Here are two to get you started.
What can you say looking at this picture? What must be true if an electron, moving at 0.6×108, stops over a distance of 10 mm? I will stop here and leave asking the remaining questions to you. There is no magic formula that will give you the answer. You have to put it together (with help).
 
  • Like
Likes rudransh verma and hutchphd
What is the direction of the field.?
 
Thank you guys for your interest but you have to know that I'm not a physicist, I'm a geologist.
Before i come here i did some research to find a similar problems, all of them them have the electron leave the parallel plates.
The question is not attached with a picture to know how it works. The problem is exactly what i mentioned.
 
Geologists are allowed to learn physics!
Who is posing this question? It is rather specific, and requires knowledge of the physics.
 
  • #10
hutchphd said:
Geologists are allowed to learn physics!
Who is posing this question? It is rather specific, and requires knowledge of the physics.
I meant that you don't have to learn everything.
It's a homework, I've finished three problems today (2 about waves and 1 optic) but this one is difficult for"me" (geologist).
 
  • #11
Maybe I can remind you the formula $$E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}$$ where E is the electric field between the plates and ##\sigma## the surface (or areal) charge density.

Also do you remember the work-energy theorem?
 
  • Like
Likes meher4real
  • #12
meher4real said:
Thank you guys for your interest but you have to know that I'm not a physicist, I'm a geologist.
Before i come here i did some research to find a similar problems, all of them them have the electron leave the parallel plates.
The question is not attached with a picture to know how it works. The problem is exactly what i mentioned.
meher4real said:
I meant that you don't have to learn everything.
It's a homework, I've finished three problems today (2 about waves and 1 optic) but this one is difficult for"me" (geologist).
Picking random formulas and solutions off of the Internet is not a good strategy for learning.

The electron enters a region with a uniform electric field, and is subject to a constant retarding force. What is the equation for that force given the electric field in that region?

And using the mass of the electron, what is the deceleration of the electron in that region? How long does it take for it to stop?
 
  • Like
Likes meher4real
  • #13
What do you think about using Capacitance formula ?
C = q/V = e0x(A/d)
C : Capacitance
V : Voltage
q : electric charge
e0 : permitivity of vacuum
A : plate area
d : distance between plates
 
  • #14
meher4real said:
What do you think about using Capacitance formula ?
C = q/V = e0x(A/d)
Another tip would be for you to check out the LaTeX tutorial link in the lower left of the Edit window. It helps you to post math equations in online forums like the PF. :smile:

C = \frac{q}{V} = e_0\frac{A}{d}
 
  • #15
meher4real said:
What do you think about using Capacitance formula ?
C = q/V = e0x(A/d)
I don't think that would be helpful. Let's simplify the problem, you have an electron with initial velocity ##v_0=0.6\times 10^8m/s## that enters an electric field and stops after traveling distance ##d=10mm##. Can you determine the strength of the electric field E (i suppose the mass and charge of the electron is given too).
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Apply Lorentz's Law ?
F = qv x B
 
  • #17
We don't have a magnetic field B present in this problem. What is the formula for the force that involves the electric field E?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #18
Thank you for your response.
There are two formulas :
E=F/q=kq/r^2 => F=Eq ?
V=U/q=W/q=Ed=kq/r ?
 
  • #19
Well ok, let's take F=Eq. So that is the force from the electric field on the electron. What is the work of this force over a distance of d=10mm?
 
  • #20
It might be the case that you haven't been taught the concept of the work of the force, in which case we ll have to do this via deceleration and kinematics equations as berkeman suggests at post #12.
 
  • #21
E=14.4x10^-6 right ?
 
  • #22
Er, i don't know, all i was planning to do was to guide you to find the right equation and then you could plug in the numbers to find the exact value.
Can you tell us how did you arrive at that number? All the intermediate steps?
 
  • #23
Understood.
k = Coulomb's constant = 9x10^9
q = electron charge = 1.60x10^-19
E = F/q = kq/d^2 = 14.4x10^-6
 
  • #24
The formula E=kq/d^2 is not correct for this problem. That is the electric field from a particle having charge q at distance d from the particle. In this problem the electric field is due to the surface charge density of the plates, not due to the electron.
 
  • #25
I asked you a question about the work of the force F=Eq (E is our unknown here which we will try to find from the other data given and q is the charge of electron). Can you answer that question?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes meher4real
  • #26
You have a constant force F=Eq that acts over a distance of d(=10mm). What is the work of this force. The next step will be to equate this work with the change in kinetic energy of the electron over the distance of d=10mm. And from that equation you ll find E.
 
  • #27
Have you been taught the concept of work and the work-energy theorem? Please at least answer this question...
 
  • #28
Delta2 said:
Have you been taught the concept of work and the work-energy theorem? Please at least answer this question...
I have no clue about Electromagnetism.
 
  • #29
I'm thinking about Coulomb's Law
F = kqq/r^2
 
  • #30
Work and Work-Energy theorem is Classical Mechanics.
No Coulomb's law won't help you here because as I said before the electric field is not due to point particles but due to the surface charge density of the parallel plates.
 
  • #31
Let me explain to you my situation here.
I used to study physics in french (my last course was four years ago), this is my first time doing it in English, plus i used to work for three years on marketing, this year I've decided to complete my education and quit my job so i can get a master degree in Geology as a foreign student.
It's a challenging stage for me and I'm motivated to pass it.
(Hope you understand why I'm struggling here)
 
  • #32
Ok I see now, in French and 4 years ago, that explains it :D.

Unfortunately I don't know French (except a few words hehe) so I don't know how Work and Work-Energy theorem is in French.

We ll try to do this with the kinematic approach. Do you recall the equations ##d=v_0t-\frac{1}{2}at^2##, ##v=v_0-at##?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Steve4Physics and meher4real
  • #33
Thank you for understanding :wink:
Of course, but how it can work with Electromagnetism ?
 
  • #34
For this problem we don't use a lot from Classical Electromagnetism, just that ##F=Eq## and that ##E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##, the rest is classical mechanics stuff.
Also for the second part you have to use the formula ##V=E\cdot l## where l is the spacing of the two plates.
 
  • #35
If the force is ##F=Eq## what is the acceleration ##a## from the electric field on the electron?
 
  • #36
Delta2 said:
For this problem we don't use a lot from Classical Electromagnetism, just that ##F=Eq## and that ##E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##, the rest is classical mechanics stuff.
Also for the second part you have to use the formula ##V=E\cdot l## where l is the spacing of the two plates.
Thank you for you time mate it means a lot :smile:
I'll take my time working on that problem, I'm watching DALLAS game rn hehe, your answers helps alot.
Can you expain the "stop" thing, what does it mean ?
 
  • #37
It means that the velocity of all the electrons that constitute the beam , from ##0.6x10^8m/s## becomes 0 as the electrons travel a distance of d=10mm inside the electric field of the parallel plates. The electric field E exerts a force ##F=Eq## to each electron which decelerates the electrons with constant deceleration ##a## (sorry if I said acceleration), and their velocity ##v## is reduced according to the equation ##v=v_0-at## until the time ##t## is such that ##v_0-at=0##, i.e. the time that the electron stops. Of course here you are given the distance and not the time but you can work out the details via the other equation ##d=v_0t-\frac{1}{2}at^2##.
 
  • Love
Likes meher4real
  • #38
You should focus solving the problem btw, not watching games that distract you...
 
  • #39
Delta2 said:
It means that the velocity of all the electrons that constitute the beam , from ##0.6x10^8m/s## becomes 0 as the electrons travel a distance of d=10mm inside the electric field of the parallel plates. The electric field E exerts a force ##F=Eq## to each electron which decelerates the electrons with constant deceleration ##a## (sorry if I said acceleration), and their velocity ##v## is reduced according to the equation ##v=v_0-at## until the time ##t## is such that ##v_0-at=0##, i.e. the time that the electron stops. Of course here you are given the distance and not the time but you can work out the details via the other equation ##d=v_0t-\frac{1}{2}at^2##.
I literally was lost, thank you so much.
 
  • #40
Delta2 said:
You should focus solving the problem btw, not watching games that distract you...
I'm a diehard DALLAS fan, i'll be back studying after the game is finished.
 
  • #42
Hi !
Is it normal to find Voltage = 111.046x10^3 V :wideeyed:
 
  • #43
Hi.

How did you find this number? Step by step please.
 
  • #44
d=V0xt => 10x10^-3 = 0.6x10^8 x t => t = 1.66x10^-10 s
d = V0t+1/2xaxt^2 (initial velocity is 0) (a=?) then 10x10^-3 m = 1/2 a (1.66x10^-10)^2
a = 7.81x10^17 m/s^-2
Also a= F/m = qE/me then E = (a x me)/q = 444.18x10^4 NC^-1
Voltage = ? l = 25x10^-3 m
V= El = 111.046x10^3 V
 
  • #45
You just can't say that ##d=v_0t## and also that ##d=v_0t+1/2at^2## , its like saying that the electron does move with constant velocity for first and that it does move with constant acceleration for the second. You just can't have both, if it moves with constant acceleration, then the velocity isn't constant.

However there is some logic in the general procedure that you follow, specifically your aim to find first ##a## and then ##E##. You are correct in finding ##E## from ##a ## but you aren't correct in finding ##a##.

So in order to find the correct value for acceleration ##a## (which is actually deceleration):
The initial velocity of the electron is not 0 but it it is 0.6x10^8m/s.
The final velocity is zero (0).

The equation for d is really ##d=v_0t-1/2at^2##. In this equation you have two unknowns the deceleration a and the time t it takes to reach zero velocity. Which other equation can you use, so that you have two equations with the same two unknowns so that you can solve the system for a and t?
 
  • Informative
Likes meher4real
  • #46
Thank you for your detailed response.
But i still confused about the difference between d=v0t-1/2at^2 and d=v0+1/2at^2 ??
How to solve "t" if you use it in that equation when "a" still unknown ?
Is the value of "t" correct ? if yes so it's about the "d" equation !
 
  • #47
No the value of t you calculated is not correct.

You have to use a system of two equations with two unknowns to solve for both a and t. I will tell you that the two equations are :
##d=v_0t-1/2at^2##
##0=v_0-at##.
 
  • Love
Likes meher4real
  • #48
I found t= 3.33x10^-10 s and a = 1.80x10^17
E= 102.47x10^4
V= 25.6x10^3 (Still big)
What do you think ?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #49
Again you should tell me the intermediate steps and which formulas you used and how you solved that system of two equations, I haven't done the arithmetic calculations my self to know the arithmetic values for t and a.
 
  • Love
Likes meher4real
  • #50
Your value of t seems correct to me now that i did some arithmetic calculations myself.
Your value for a seems correct to me too.
 
  • Love
Likes meher4real
Back
Top