Electric field created by two charged circular arcs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field created by two charged circular arcs at a point P. The approach involves determining the differential charge elements, their distances, and integrating the resulting electric field contributions from both arcs. A key correction noted is the integration limits, which should be from -π/6 to +π/6 to accurately cover the arcs' angles. Additionally, the importance of symmetry in simplifying the problem is highlighted, as it allows for quicker calculations by eliminating certain components of the electric field. The user expresses a desire to practice both detailed calculations and the use of symmetry for efficiency.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Two circular arcs of radius ##R## are uniformly charged with a positive charge per unit length ##\lambda##. The arcs lie on a plane as shown in the figure below. Each arc subtends an angle ##\theta=\frac{\pi}{3}##.

What is the direction and magnitude of the electric field anywhere along the ##z## axis that passes through the center of the circular arcs, perpendicular to the plane of the figure?
Relevant Equations
Infinitesimal electric field created by an infinitesimal charge ##dq## on the right-side arc
$$d\vec{E}_{p_r}=\frac{k_e dq}{r_{dq,p}^2}\hat{r}_{dq,p}$$
The strategy will be to figure out what ##dq##, ##\hat{r}_{dq,p}##, and ##r_{dq,p}## are, plug them into the expression for ##d\vec{E}_{p_r}##, then integrate over ##d\vec{E}_{p_r}## to obtain ##\vec{E}_{p_r}##, the electric field at ##P## due to the arc on the right.

Then I will repeat the process to calculate ##d\vec{E}_{p_l}## and ##\vec{E}_{p_l}##, for the arc on the left. The latter will be basically the same result as for ##d\vec{E}_{p_r}## but with one sign changed.

$$dq=\lambda ds = \lambda R d\theta$$

Here are the original sketch of the problem and my own sketch
1636711870367.png
1636711928531.jpeg

$$\vec{r}_{dq,p}=\vec{r}_{0,p}-\vec{r}_{0,dq}$$

$$\vec{r}_{0,p}=z\hat{k}$$

$$\hat{r}_{0,dq}=\cos{\theta}\hat{i} +\sin{\theta}\hat{j}$$

$$\vec{r}_{0,dq}=R\hat{r}_{0,dq}=R(\cos{\theta}\hat{i} +\sin{\theta}\hat{j})$$

$$\implies \vec{r}_{dq,p}=z\hat{k}-R\cos{\theta}\hat{i} -R\sin{\theta}\hat{j}$$

$$d\vec{E}_{p_r}=\frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(z\hat{k}-R\cos{\theta}\hat{i} -R\sin{\theta}\hat{j})$$

The expression for ##d\vec{E}_{p_l}## is derived analogously, and the only thing that changes is s sign on ##\hat{r}_{0,dq}##

$$\hat{r}_{0,dq}=-\cos{\theta}\hat{i} +\sin{\theta}\hat{j}$$

$$d\vec{E}_{p_l}=\frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(z\hat{k}+R\cos{\theta}\hat{i} -R\sin{\theta}\hat{j})$$

Now we integrate over ##\theta##

$$\vec{E}_{p_r}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{3}}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(z\hat{k}-R\cos{\theta}\hat{i} -R\sin{\theta}\hat{j})$$

$$\vec{E}_{p_l}=\int_{-\frac{\pi}{3}}^{\frac{\pi}{3}} \frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(z\hat{k}+R\cos{\theta}\hat{i} -R\sin{\theta}\hat{j})$$

We end up with

$$\vec{E}_{p_r}=\frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(\frac{2\pi z}{3}\hat{z} -R\sqrt{3}\hat{i})$$$$\vec{E}_{p_l}=\frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}(\frac{2\pi z}{3}\hat{z} +R\sqrt{3}\hat{i})$$

Therefore

$$\vec{E}_p=\vec{E}_{p_r}+\vec{E}_{p_l}=\frac{k_e \lambda R d\theta}{(z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}\frac{4\pi z}{3}\hat{k}$$
$$=\frac{\lambda R z}{3\epsilon_0 (z^2+R^2)^{3/2}}\hat{k}$$

I'd like to know if this solution is correct because I am following along on MIT Open Learning Library and this is a practice problem. I am allowed to submit answers, and am given a correct/incorrect feedback. For the expression above, I am getting incorrect, though I can't figure out why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @zenterix. Your integration limits should be ##-\frac {\pi}{6}## to ##+\frac {\pi}{6}## (to cover a total angle of ##\frac {\pi}{3}## for each arc).

Are you required to do the formal vector/integration method as an exercise? The problem can be solved in a few lines of basic algebra using some simple observations:
- by symmetry, the x and y components of the field at P are zero;
- the magnitude of the field at P from each charge-element (dq) is ##dE = \frac {kdq}{z^2 + R^2}##;
- the z-component of ##\vec {dE}## is ##dE cos(\phi)## where ##\phi## is the angle between the z-axis and the line from P to the charge-element.

It's a useful exercise to try as you will see how much easier/quicker the use of symmetry can make a problem.
 
I can't believe I missed the integral limits! My god.

I am aware of the symmetry of the problem. At this stage I am doing the full calculations to get practice doing the calculus. But I will try to just use symmetry to also get practice with identifying such shortcuts from now on as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top