Electric field due to a uniformly charged rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field due to a uniformly charged rod positioned in the xy-plane, extending from (0,0) to (L,0) with a uniform charge density (lambda). The initial solution attempts to derive the electric field on the x-axis for the interval 0 < x < L using the formula dEx = kdQ/r^2, where dQ is expressed as lambda*ds. A critical error identified is the incorrect expression for the distance r, which should be the direct distance between the point of interest (a) and the differential element (x). The solution suggests breaking the integration into two segments: from 0 to a and from a to L for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of charge density concepts in electrostatics
  • Ability to visualize and analyze geometric configurations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the principle of superposition in electrostatics
  • Explore integration techniques for solving physics problems involving variable limits
  • Investigate the effects of different charge distributions on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charge distributions.

sprinks13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi, here's the question:

a rod in the xy plane has it's ends at (0,0) and (L,0). It has a uniform charge per unit length (lambda). Find the electric field on the x-axis for 0 < x < L.

solution attempt:

dEx = dE
= kdQ/r^2

dQ = lambda*ds = (Q/L)*dx

now i took my r = (L - a - x) where x is the location of dx and a is the distance from L to the point that the field is being measured (note that 0 < a < L).

dEx = KQ/L (integral) dx/(L - a -x)^2

So my problem is my r. It's wrong, but I am not sure why or how to fix it.

thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sprinks13 said:
now i took my r = (L - a - x) where x is the location of dx and a is the distance from L to the point that the field is being measured (note that 0 < a < L).
If a is the location where you want the field, then r is just the distance between a and x. Hint: break the region 0 to L into two: 0 to a & a to L.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K