Electric Field due to Point Charges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field due to two point charges, Q1 = +5*10^(-6) C and Q2 = -2*10^(-6) C, separated by 50 cm. The electric potential is zero at 0.36 m from Q1, but the electric field at that point is calculated incorrectly by the user. The correct formula for the electric field magnitude is E = k[((5*10^(-6))/0.36^2) + ((2*10^(-6))/(0.14^2))], resulting in an electric field of approximately 1.2*10^6 N/C. The user misunderstood the significance of the charge signs when calculating the magnitude of the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law
  • Knowledge of superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Proficiency in using the formula E = kQ/r^2
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of superposition in electric fields
  • Study the derivation and application of Coulomb's Law
  • Learn how to calculate electric fields from multiple point charges
  • Explore the concept of electric field direction and its relation to charge signs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone preparing for exams involving electric fields and potentials.

Caiti
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

[/B]

The following is on a practice exam I have been completing. In advance, it is part b I am struggling with.

Two point charges Q1 = +5*10^(-6)C and -2*10^(-6)C are 50cm apart.
a) Where along a line that passes through the two charges is the electric potential zero (apart
from at r=infinity)?

b) Determine the magnitude of the electric field at that point. Explain why the electric field is non-zero.

Homework Equations


E=kQ/r^2

V=kQ/r

E=dV/dr

The Attempt at a Solution


I got part A immediately using V=kQ/r and superposition of electric potential, finding it to be 0.36m (which matched the solution). It is part b that I am struggling with. I have as follows:

E=kQ/r^2
Using superposition of electric fields, this gives
E = k(5/(0.36^2) + -2/(0.5-0.36)^2), where k=1/(4*pi*E_0). This gave me an electric field of -570367N/C; however, the solution said it was 1.2*10^6 N/C. I believe the issue was in my implementation of the -2C in the above equation; however, am not entirely sure why this is incorrect or what to do to fix it.

As for the explanation, my belief is that because E is changing in potential with respective to distance, as long as the potential is not set at a constant 0 - that is, the potential is changing as distance changes - the electric field could be non-zero. I think I'm okay with this, but please do not hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong!

I'd really appreciate some help in figuring this out - or even just in where I went wrong. Please let me know if I've forgotten anything or my working isn't clear.

Thank you so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right there was something wrong with the use of the -2 x 10-6C. The equation should be E=k[((5x10-6)/0.362)+((2x10-6)/0.142)], because we are finding the magnitude of the electric field, so the plus and minus signs doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:
robotpie3000 said:
You are right there was something wrong with the use of the -2 x 10-6C. The equation should be E=k[((5x10-6)/0.362)+((2x10-6)/0.142)], because we are finding the magnitude of the electric field, so the plus and minus signs doesn't matter.

So does that mean that if we were finding the electric field, not magnitude, I would be correct? Or would I still use E=k[((5x10-6)/0.362)+((2x10-6)/0.142)] , then choose direction afterwards?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K