Electric field generated by ions in a box

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of an ionized gas in a cylindrical box under the influence of gravity and electric forces. The problem involves understanding the distribution of positive and negative ions in equilibrium and determining the electric field within the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the arrangement of ions, questioning whether positive ions would settle at the bottom and how negative ions would interact with them. Some consider modeling the density of ions and potential energy, while others suggest alternating layers of ions. There are inquiries about relevant equations and the derivation of certain formulas.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing thoughts and hints without providing direct solutions. Some have suggested connections to barometric formulas and electrostatics, while others are seeking clarification on specific equations and concepts related to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is from an admission test, which may impose specific constraints on the approach and solution methods. There is also mention of the need for understanding the situation before applying equations.

Bestfrog

Homework Statement


A ionized gas (overall neutral) is in a cylindrical box with radius ##R## and ##h<<R##, with is main axis along ##\hat{z}## (there is acceleration of gravity ##\vec{g}=-g \hat{z}##). The ions are points: some of mass ##M## and charge ##q>0## (heavy positive ions) and some of mass ##m<M## and charge ##q<0## (light negative ions).
The system is at uniform and constant temperature and we can neglect the fact that ions don't tie themselves. (Sorry for bad English)
What is the distribution of ions in a condition of equilibrium and what is the electric field in the cylinder?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured to put firstly the positive ions. They go on the perimeter of the down face of the cylinder (down because of gravity, on the perimeter because of the Coulomb's force). If I put now the negative ions they are attracted by the positive ones and by gravity (also them would stay on the perimeter) but in this situation positive and negative ions are attached one another. Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In other words: if you would do this exercise with neutral molecules, they would all go on the down face of the cylinder ?
Do collect a few relevant equations and list them under 2. !
 
BvU said:
In other words: if you would do this exercise with neutral molecules, they would all go on the down face of the cylinder ?
No, they don't. If they have a velocity ##\vec{v}##, the components ##v_x ,v_y## change after bumps (on average they remain the same). Only the component ##v_z## is accelerated. But if I search an equilibrium condition, the ions can't be stationary, they have to move with a steady speed, I don't how.
 
Still don't see no equations. In what section of your textbook is this exercise ?
 
My first thought was to try modelling it as the positive ions having a linearly reducing density with height, and the negative ions a correspondingly increasing density. You could then calculate the overall electrical and gravitational potential energies. The actual density gradient should be whatever minimises this PE.
However, I don't think this works. The electrical field would not be uniform, I suspect.
Second thought is to try alternating infinitesimal layers of positive and negative, starting with positive at the bottom. Find the layer thickness which minimises the PE.
 
BvU said:
Still don't see no equations. In what section of your textbook is this exercise ?
I didn't put any equation because I think it is useless until I understand the situation (because the use of equations can change from one situation to another). This is a problem taken from an admission test :)
 
How can I help you to get under way with this without giving it away ? Admission tests sometimes test ingenuity and creativity instead of sheer knowledge.

In this case I think post #2 contains enough of a hint to point you at barometric height formulas (yes, equations!) and encourage you to somehow combine with electrostatics.

To be fair, I don't have the full answer for you, just try to help.
@haruspex : any interest in this one ?
 
BvU said:
How can I help you to get under way with this without giving it away ? Admission tests sometimes test ingenuity and creativity instead of sheer knowledge.
You took the point

BvU said:
In this case I think post #2 contains enough of a hint to point you at barometric height formulas (yes, equations!) and encourage you to somehow combine with electrostatics.
Thank you, now I try to write an answer

BvU said:
@haruspex : any interest in this one ?
He already answered me in the section "Introductory Homeworks" (It is a my mistake to put this exercise in that section, but I don't know how to delete a post)
 
Here I am again: I found that one guy solved it by starting from this formula: ##\rho (z)## density of gas, ##\phi (z)## density of charge. So the equation is $$\rho(z) gz + \phi(z) Ez + \int_z^h \rho(z')g dz' = constant$$ I would like to know where this equation comes from (it is the Bernoulli equation for fluids that don't flow) because on internet I don't find anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Bestfrog said:
Here I am again: I found that one guy solved it by starting from this formula: ##\rho (z)## density of gas, ##\phi (z)## density of charge. So the equation is $$\rho(z) gz + \phi(z) Ez + \int_z^h \rho(z')g dz' = constant$$ I would like to know where this equation comes from (it is the Bernoulli equation for fluids that don't flow) because on internet I don't find anything.
Shouldn't there be a γ/(γ-1) factor on the integral? See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle#Compressible_flow_equation
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
I
Second thought is to try alternating infinitesimal layers of positive and negative, starting with positive at the bottom. Find the layer thickness which minimises the PE.
I think that the key idea is that if the gravitational and electric forces act on a ion, the vectorial sum must be 0. So in the stationary state I must impose that the PE is minimum. But how to translate in numbers this idea?
 
  • #12
Bestfrog said:
I think that the key idea is that if the gravitational and electric forces act on a ion, the vectorial sum must be 0. So in the stationary state I must impose that the PE is minimum. But how to translate in numbers this idea?
That would be a Calculus of Variations problem. Are you familiar with that subject?
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
That would be a Calculus of Variations problem. Are you familiar with that subject?
No, I will study it. Can you show me only the set up?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K