Electric field in insulating slab

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
A large, thin, insulating slab [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]5[/itex] mm has a charge of [itex]2[/itex] x [itex]10^{-10}[/itex] C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, [itex]0.5[/itex] mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

[itex]E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

where [itex]E[/itex] is the net electric field acting on point P, [itex]E_{1}[/itex] is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and [itex]E_{2}[/itex] is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

[itex]\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}[/itex]

[itex]Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A[/itex]

[itex]Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A[/itex]

[itex]E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

[itex]E = 2.26[/itex] N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire said:
A large, thin, insulating slab [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]5[/itex] mm has a charge of [itex]2[/itex] x [itex]10^{-10}[/itex] C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, [itex]0.5[/itex] mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

[itex]E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

where [itex]E[/itex] is the net electric field acting on point P, [itex]E_{1}[/itex] is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and [itex]E_{2}[/itex] is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

[itex]\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}[/itex]

[itex]Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A[/itex]

[itex]Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A[/itex]

[itex]E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

[itex]E = 2.26[/itex] N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
That looks correct to me. :approve:

Oh, except for one thing. You said, "Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders." I think you meant pillboxes. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person