Electric field in insulating slab

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at a point P within a large, thin insulating slab measuring 2 m x 2 m x 5 mm, uniformly charged with 2 x 10-10 C. The calculation employs Gauss' Law, using two Gaussian surfaces (pillboxes) to determine the net electric field at point P, located 0.5 mm from the top face of the slab. The final computed electric field is 2.26 N/C, confirming the accuracy of the process, with a minor correction regarding the terminology of Gaussian surfaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations
  • Knowledge of charge density and its calculation
  • Basic concepts of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' Law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations in non-uniform charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of charge density in various materials
  • Investigate the properties of electric fields in insulating materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in electrostatics and electric field analysis.

temaire
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
A large, thin, insulating slab [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]5[/itex] mm has a charge of [itex]2[/itex] x [itex]10^{-10}[/itex] C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, [itex]0.5[/itex] mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

[itex]E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

where [itex]E[/itex] is the net electric field acting on point P, [itex]E_{1}[/itex] is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and [itex]E_{2}[/itex] is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

[itex]\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}[/itex]

[itex]Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A[/itex]

[itex]Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A[/itex]

[itex]E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

[itex]E = 2.26[/itex] N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
temaire said:
A large, thin, insulating slab [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]2[/itex] m x [itex]5[/itex] mm has a charge of [itex]2[/itex] x [itex]10^{-10}[/itex] C distributed uniformly throughout its volume. determine the electric field at observation point P, which is located within the slab, beneath its centre, [itex]0.5[/itex] mm from the top face.

udI1k.png


I started off by making two Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders. The first ranges from the bottom of the slab to point P. The second ranges from point P to the top of the slab. I then calculated the net electric field on point P due to the electric fields traveling out of the ends of the two Gaussian surfaces, using Gauss' Law.

[itex]E = E_{1} - E_{2} = \frac{Q_{1}}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{Q_{2}}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

where [itex]E[/itex] is the net electric field acting on point P, [itex]E_{1}[/itex] is the electric field from the first Gaussian surface, and [itex]E_{2}[/itex] is the electric field from the second Gaussian surface.

The charge density is as follows:

[itex]\rho = Q/V = 2\cdot 10^{-10}/(2\cdot2\cdot0.005) = 1\cdot10^{-8}[/itex]

[itex]Q_{1}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0045 = 4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A[/itex]

[itex]Q_{2}=\rho V = \rho A \cdot 0.0005 = 5\cdot 10^{-12}A[/itex]

[itex]E = \frac{4.5\cdot 10^{-11}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}} - \frac{5\cdot 10^{-12}A}{2A\epsilon_{o}}[/itex]

[itex]E = 2.26[/itex] N/C

My final answer is 2.26 N/C. Is my process correct?
That looks correct to me. :approve:

Oh, except for one thing. You said, "Gaussian surfaces in the shape of cylinders." I think you meant pillboxes. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K