Electric field inside a resistor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field inside a 20-ohm resistor made of a thin metal wire (3mm length, 0.1mm diameter) with a potential of 8 volts and a current of 0.4 amps is calculated to be 2.67 volts per millimeter. This calculation utilizes Ohm's law (V = IR) to determine the voltage drop and the relationship between electric field and potential (E = ΔV/L). The electric field exists only while current flows through the wire; once the current ceases, the wire returns to electrostatic equilibrium, resulting in no internal electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law (V = IR)
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for evaluating voltage and electric field relationships
  • Basic principles of electrostatics and current flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Ohm's Law in different circuit configurations
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field and potential in conductive materials
  • Explore Gauss's Law and its implications in electrostatics
  • Investigate the effects of temperature and material properties on resistance and electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of electric fields in conductive materials, particularly in resistive components.

SparkimusPrime
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
A resistor (20 ohm) is made of a very thin piece of metal wire, length = 3mm and diameter = .1mm. Given that it has a potential of 8 volts and .4 amps of current running through it, what is the electric field inside the wire?

I know there's no electrostatic equilibrium here, so I can't just take the easy answer and say there is no electric field internal to a cylinder. It seems I must use the equation that relates voltage to electric field:

V = integral(E * ds)

But, as this seems to be based upon Gauss's law (which I haven't the firmest hold) I hate to assume that I can use the equation when the charge is in motion (current).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is almost right: ΔV = - ∫ E ds. This is not based on Gauss's law, but on the relationship between field and potential.

In your example, the magnitude of the field is E = ΔV/L.
 


You are correct in your thinking that the equation V = integral(E * ds) is based on Gauss's law, which states that the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by that surface. However, this equation can still be used to find the electric field inside a resistor, even when there is a current running through it.

In this case, the resistor is a thin wire with a length of 3mm and a diameter of 0.1mm. We can assume that the wire is cylindrical in shape, and the electric field will be uniform inside the wire. Using the equation V = integral(E * ds), we can solve for the electric field inside the wire by first calculating the voltage drop across the wire.

The voltage drop across the wire can be found using Ohm's law, V = IR, where V is the voltage, I is the current, and R is the resistance. In this case, the resistance of the wire is 20 ohms, so the voltage drop across the wire is 8 volts.

Next, we can plug this value into the equation V = integral(E * ds) and solve for the electric field, E. Since the wire is cylindrical, the integral becomes V = E * integral(ds), which simplifies to V = E * length. Plugging in the values we know, we get 8 volts = E * 3mm. Solving for E, we get an electric field of 2.67 volts per millimeter inside the wire.

It is important to note that this electric field is only present while there is a current running through the wire. Once the current is turned off, the wire will return to electrostatic equilibrium and there will be no electric field inside the wire.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K