Electric field inside a slab of with constant charge density.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field inside a slab with a constant charge density. Participants are exploring the implications of charge distribution and symmetry in the context of electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to interpret the question regarding uniform charge distribution and considers different geometrical approaches, such as using a sphere instead of a cylinder for the Gaussian surface. Some participants question the implications of symmetry on the electric field components, particularly in relation to the curved side of the cylinder.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, discussing the role of symmetry in determining the electric field. There is a suggestion that the electric field component in certain directions may be zero due to symmetry, although this is not universally agreed upon. The conversation reflects a mix of intuitive reasoning and acknowledgment of more rigorous mathematical approaches.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that the slab is infinitely wide in the x and y planes, which influences the discussion on symmetry and electric field behavior. Participants are also navigating the complexity of the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have attached the question in a picture. I also attached a picture a drew as my attempt at understanding the question.


Homework Equations


flux = EA = Qenclo


The Attempt at a Solution


So I am not sure how to interpret this question. Is the charge distributed uniformly? If it is then it can be very difficult to solve as you can see in my diagram the electric field goes every where.

Instead of a cylinder I was thinking of using a sphere as my surface... Does that even make sense?


Here is an answer I found online:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100124155001AAmSOpU

Do you guys agree? I notice the solution only used the top and bottom area of the gaussian surface...
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    18.1 KB · Views: 643
  • photo (7).JPG
    photo (7).JPG
    23.1 KB · Views: 580
Physics news on Phys.org
usually, the slab is taken to be infinitely (or at least, very) wide in the x and y planes. So using symmetry, what do you think would be the electric field component in the direction of the cylinder's curved side?
 
BruceW said:
usually, the slab is taken to be infinitely (or at least, very) wide in the x and y planes. So using symmetry, what do you think would be the electric field component in the direction of the cylinder's curved side?

It seems like it should be zero, if it isn't it's extremely difficult to solve... But I don't know why...?
 
Yeah, its zero. When I was doing undergraduate physics, the explanation they offered was that due to symmetry, it will be zero. If you think about the situation, it would be hard to imagine how the electric field in this direction would be non-zero, while still keeping the symmetry of the problem.

I guess to do this problem properly, you could use rigorous mathematical arguments about symmetry groups. But that is stuff beyond most physics undergraduates, so an intuitive explanation is OK.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K