Electric field of a circular plate with non uniform charge density.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field on the axis of a circular plate with a non-uniform charge density defined by \(\sigma_0 \frac{r^2}{a^2} \delta(z)\). The derived electric field expression is given by \(E_z = \frac{\sigma_0}{2 \epsilon_0 a^2} \left[\frac{4}{3}z \sqrt{a^2+z^2}- 2z \sqrt{z^2} - \frac{z(a^2 - 2z^2)}{3 \sqrt{a^2+z^2}}\right]\). Upon taking the approximation for \(z >> a\), the electric field simplifies to \(E_z \simeq \frac{\sigma_0 a^2}{12 \epsilon_0 z^2}\), resembling the field of a point charge, confirming the expected \(1/r^2\) dependence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with charge density distributions
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly limits and approximations
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics, including Gauss's Law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using Gauss's Law
  • Learn about the implications of charge density variations on electric field calculations
  • Explore advanced electrostatics concepts, including multipole expansions
  • Investigate the behavior of electric fields in different geometries and charge configurations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers in electrostatics who are interested in understanding electric fields generated by non-uniform charge distributions.

loops496
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Hey!

I need to calculate the electric field on the axis of a circular plate of radius a with the following charge distribution:
[tex]\sigma_0 \frac{r^2}{a^2} \delta (z), \; r\leq a[/tex][tex]0, \; r>a[/tex]
where [itex]\sigma_0[/itex] is a constant.
I've already calculated the potential and taken its gradient to get the field, which is only in z and its given by,
[tex]E_z = \frac{\sigma_0}{2 \epsilon_0 a^2} \left[\frac{4}{3}z \sqrt{a^2+z^2}- 2z \sqrt{z^2} - \frac{z(a^2 - 2z^2)}{3 \sqrt{a^2+z^2}}\right][/tex]

Now I have to take the approximation [itex]z>>a[/itex] and describe the field. Intuitively it should be the like the field of a point charge, but i can not get the [itex]1/r^2[/itex] dependence after the approximation.
Is there something wrong?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just need to approximate your right hand side. Taking just the square brackets, it is equal to:
\begin{align}
&\frac{4}{3}z^2\sqrt{1+\frac{a^2}{z^2}}-2z^2-\frac{2z^2\left(\frac{a^2}{2z^2}-1\right)}{3\sqrt{\frac{a^2}{z^2}+1}}\simeq \frac{4}{3}z^2\left(1+\frac{a^2}{2z^2}\right)-2z^2-\frac{2}{3}z^2\left(1-\frac{a^2}{2z^2}\right)\left(1-\frac{a^2}{2z^2}\right) \\
&=-\frac{2}{3}z^2+\frac{2}{3}a^2+\frac{2}{3}z^2-\frac{2}{3}a^2+\frac{a^4}{6z^2}=\frac{a^4}{6z^2},
\end{align}
and so your field is:
\begin{align}
E_z\simeq \frac{\sigma_0a^2}{12\epsilon_0z^2}.
\end{align}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh my algebra was off on that one! thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
552
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
950
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K