Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electric Field of extended mass

  1. Feb 16, 2012 #1
    So here is the scenario (see attachment) - I have a semicircle wire (radius R=15.9cm) which is made of insulator material , the semicircle consist of two combined quartercircle wires parts where one has equally distributed charge +Q and the other has -Q . Required is find the Electric field in direction of x at the origin . Q=5.33nC

    My approach was as follows

    Let E = 1/(4*pi*e)∫1/(R^2).dQ r

    dQ=λ*ds and ds=R*dθ and i also know that unit vector r = cosθ*i+sinθ*j

    therefore for the E in x direction i get this expression

    E = 1/(4*pi*e)*1/(R^2)*λ*R∫cosθ.dθ

    Integrating from 0 to pi ( thus taking only half of the semicircle ) and using λ as 2/(pi*r)

    I get Q/(2*pi^2*e*R^2) .
    Because the other half has opposite charge i can say that the Etot = Eneg +Epos

    Therefore i multiply the equation by two to finaly get


    If i put the values given i get as absolute value 2413 N/C for Electric field at origin of circel in the direction of x

    Unfortunately it is a wrong solution :( !! What is the mistake i hv done ?? Can anyone spot it ? Thanks in advance

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 16, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Redoctober! :smile:
    noooo :cry:

    0 to π/2 :redface:
  4. Feb 16, 2012 #3
    Oh !! srrry typo error :S :S , i integrated from 0 to pi/2 .
    The answer 2413 N/C is wrong :/ !
  5. Feb 16, 2012 #4
    Anyone has a solution ?? :/ !
  6. Feb 17, 2012 #5
    The E field for the right part of your semi circle is given by
    [tex]E = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{-Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^2} d\theta[/tex]
    While the E field for the left part is the same but with +Q charge and integrated from [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] to [itex]\pi[/itex]. Just add these two together to get the total field.
  7. Feb 17, 2012 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Are you sure? An electric field is a vector, and the correct formula is

    [tex]\vec{E}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \rho(\vec{x}') \frac{\vec{x}-\vec{x}'}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|^3}.[/tex]

    Of course, in the here considered case, you have to integrate along the semicircle and use the charge per length instead of the bulk-charge density. However, you should check, whether you have all the geometrical factors for you vector component right.
  8. Feb 17, 2012 #7
    Vanhees is right , Electric field is a vector .
    So regarding the E will be in radial direction .
    For the Y axis we need to consider the j component .

    Vanhees , your mathematical expression is a bit high beyond my math skill xD !

    My question is why the final expression for the problem is wrong :/

    i considered the +Q and -Q E vector addition

    I reached to the conclusion of

    |E| = Q/(4*pi^2*e*r^2) (In the direction of J

    Btw : how do u write the math expressions in that style xD . my way of typing the math is silly :/ !!
  9. Feb 19, 2012 #8
    The final equation i got was actually correct

    i made an error with the calculation thats why my answer was wrong :)
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2012
  10. Feb 19, 2012 #9


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes, I've checked your result too. It's correct. I parametrized the line charge with help of the charge per angle:

    -\frac{2 Q}{\pi} & \text{for} \quad 0 \leq \varphi \leq \pi/2 \\
    +\frac{2Q}{\pi} & \text{for} \quad \pi/2<\varphi\leq \pi \\
    0 & \text{elsewhere}.

    Then you can use my formula for [itex]\vec{x}=0[/itex] to get

    [tex]\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi' \lambda(\varphi') \begin{pmatrix} -\cos \varphi' \\ -\sin \varphi' \\0 \end{pmatrix}.[/tex]

    Integrating over the two regions gives finally

    [tex]\vec{E}=\frac{Q}{\pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2} \vec{e}_x.[/tex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Electric Field of extended mass
  1. Electric field (Replies: 3)

  2. Electric fields (Replies: 7)