Electric Field of Spherical Cavity with Q=1400C & R=10m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swagger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cavity Spherical
AI Thread Summary
A positive charge of 1400 C is uniformly distributed in a sphere with a radius of 10 m, and a spherical cavity of radius 5 m is cut out, affecting the electric field at point P, located 24.5 m from the center. The electric field calculations must consider the different distances to point P for the original sphere and the cavity. The electric field is a vector quantity, requiring attention to direction and the varying charge enclosed by the spheres. To find the charge of the smaller cavity, the volume charge density can be used to calculate the charge based on its volume. Accurate calculations of the electric field must account for these factors to determine the correct magnitude at point P.
Swagger
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A positive charge Q = 1400.00 C is uniformly distributed over the volume of a sphere of radius R = 10.00 m. Suppose a spherical cavity of radius R/2 is cut out of the solid sphere, the center of the cavity being a distance R/2 from the center of the original solid sphere (see figure). The cut-out material and its charge are discarded. What is the magnitude of the electric field produced by this new charge distribution at point P, a distance r = 24.50 m from the center of the original sphere?

(picture attached)

I have calculated the E-field of the point using the equation E=kQ/r^2. I first did this using the radius 24.5m. I then used the radius 24.5m-5m=19.5m. I then subtracted these two E-field calculations and get the wrong answer. E(r) - E(r-R/2)

What am I doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • sphere.gif
    sphere.gif
    1.9 KB · Views: 771
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see the attachments yet, but first of all remember that the electric field is a vector not a scalar. You need to take the directions into account. Then, the electric field given by E=kQ/r^2 is with respect to the center of the sphere in each case. So use the proper distances to the point P. Also, the charge enclosed by your two spheres are different.
 
Last edited:
I did. The charge in the center in postitive so the direction on the e-field is positive along the x-axis, right?
 
Did you account for the fact that the charge on each sphere is different?
 
I assumed they were the same sense it says "A positive charge is uniformly distributed over the volume of the sphere". If they are not, how do I find out the charges?
 
It says, the postive charge is uniformly distributed over the volume. So, the volume charge density \rho is constant, and can be calculated.

From this, you can find the charge on the smaller sphere by multiplying by its volume.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top