Electric flux changing forumla variables

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 7K views
kirby2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
A point charge Q at the center of a sphere of radius R produces an electric flux of (flux symbol) coming out of the sphere. If the charge remains the same but the radius of the sphere is doubled, the electric flux coming out of it will be?

LINK TO ORIGINAL PROBLEM: http://i.imgur.com/e8Tmt.png

ATTEMPT: using the formula: flux=E(4(pi)r^2) I got (flux symbol)/4 as my answer. Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kirby2 said:
A point charge Q at the center of a sphere of radius R produces an electric flux of (flux symbol) coming out of the sphere. If the charge remains the same but the radius of the sphere is doubled, the electric flux coming out of it will be?

LINK TO ORIGINAL PROBLEM: http://i.imgur.com/e8Tmt.png

ATTEMPT: using the formula: flux=E(4(pi)r^2) I got (flux symbol)/4 as my answer. Is this right?

Have you studied Gauss' Law? What does it say about the flux and the total charge contained within a boundary?
 
well flux is = EA where A = 4(pi)r^2 and E = (kq)/r^2. so, it looks like the r^2 will cancel when multiplied, meaning that changing the radius doesn't change the flux. is this sound logic?
 
kirby2 said:
well flux is = EA where A = 4(pi)r^2 and E = (kq)/r^2. so, it looks like the r^2 will cancel when multiplied, meaning that changing the radius doesn't change the flux. is this sound logic?

That'll do :smile:

FYI, Gauss' Law states that the total flux through a closed bounding surface is entirely determined by the total charge contained within that surface:

[itex]\Phi = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}[/itex]

That's probably a more direct route to the same answer.