Electric flux changing forumla variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of electric flux produced by a point charge at the center of a sphere, specifically examining how changes in the radius of the sphere affect the electric flux when the charge remains constant.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric flux and the radius of the sphere, with attempts to apply relevant formulas such as Gauss' Law. Questions arise regarding the impact of changing the radius on the total flux.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the implications of Gauss' Law on the problem, suggesting that the total flux is determined by the charge enclosed, regardless of the radius. There is an ongoing exploration of the reasoning behind the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the formulas used and questioning the assumptions about the relationship between radius and electric flux in the context of the problem.

kirby2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
A point charge Q at the center of a sphere of radius R produces an electric flux of (flux symbol) coming out of the sphere. If the charge remains the same but the radius of the sphere is doubled, the electric flux coming out of it will be?

LINK TO ORIGINAL PROBLEM: http://i.imgur.com/e8Tmt.png

ATTEMPT: using the formula: flux=E(4(pi)r^2) I got (flux symbol)/4 as my answer. Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kirby2 said:
A point charge Q at the center of a sphere of radius R produces an electric flux of (flux symbol) coming out of the sphere. If the charge remains the same but the radius of the sphere is doubled, the electric flux coming out of it will be?

LINK TO ORIGINAL PROBLEM: http://i.imgur.com/e8Tmt.png

ATTEMPT: using the formula: flux=E(4(pi)r^2) I got (flux symbol)/4 as my answer. Is this right?

Have you studied Gauss' Law? What does it say about the flux and the total charge contained within a boundary?
 
well flux is = EA where A = 4(pi)r^2 and E = (kq)/r^2. so, it looks like the r^2 will cancel when multiplied, meaning that changing the radius doesn't change the flux. is this sound logic?
 
kirby2 said:
well flux is = EA where A = 4(pi)r^2 and E = (kq)/r^2. so, it looks like the r^2 will cancel when multiplied, meaning that changing the radius doesn't change the flux. is this sound logic?

That'll do :smile:

FYI, Gauss' Law states that the total flux through a closed bounding surface is entirely determined by the total charge contained within that surface:

[itex]\Phi = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}[/itex]

That's probably a more direct route to the same answer.
 
thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K