Electric Flux question [Surface integral]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric flux through a non-conducting square plate due to a charge positioned above it. The charge is located at a height of l/2 over the center of the plate, and the original poster is exploring the use of surface integrals to find the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the electric flux using a surface integral approach, expressing the electric field as a function of coordinates on the plate. They raise questions about how to proceed with the integration, particularly regarding the treatment of variables as constants during integration.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in discussing the integration process, with some providing insights on handling the integrals involved. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the angle between the electric field and the differential area element, suggesting a need for careful consideration of this relationship.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has chosen to neglect any induction effects in their calculations, which may influence the discussion on the assumptions made regarding the electric field and its interaction with the surface area of the plate.

rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Q] A charge 'Q' is kept over a non-conducting square plate of side 'l' at a height l/2 over the center of the plate. Find the electric flux through the square plate surface. Neglect any induction that may occur.

Homework Equations



[tex] \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Well.. it was pretty simple to do using Gauss law. Just take a cube as the surface and then the flux will be equal from all surfaces.. so the flux through one surface would be [itex]\frac{q}{6\varepsilon_o}[/itex]..

but i wanted to actually try a surface integral.. so I found out the Electric field as a function of the coordinates (x, y) on the square plate. Here, one of the corners is taken as the origin (0, 0):

[tex] E(x, y) = \frac{2Q\sqrt{(l - x)^2 + (l - y)^2}}{\pi \varepsilon_o \left[4(l - x)^2 + 4(l - y)^2 + l^2\right]^\frac{3}{2}}[/tex]

Also..

[tex] \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS} = \int EdS\cos{\theta}[/tex]

and
[tex] dS = d(xy) = xdy + ydx[/tex]

so..

[tex] \phi = \int \overrightarrow{E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dS} = \int E(xdy + ydx)[/tex]

I have no idea how to go from here.

Any help will be appreciated. Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you have two integrals there at the end, the integral of E*x*dy and the integral of E*y*dx, and you have that big expression for E in terms of x and y(which I only assume you did correctly)

Go nuts
 
blochwave said:
Well you have two integrals there at the end, the integral of E*x*dy and the integral of E*y*dx, and you have that big expression for E in terms of x and y(which I only assume you did correctly)

Go nuts

I get that.. but how do I solve E*x*dy? I mean.. while integrating the term with 'dy' do I take 'x' to be constant and vice versa for dx?
 
Yes...

Except the whole affair is going to be a little fishier than that because you have to take into account the angle between E and dS at every point. You smartly wrote E dot dS then ignored that in writing E(xdy+ydx), which would imply that the electric field and dS are always parallel, which is only true at one point; the one directly beneath the charge
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K