Electric/Magnetic field Inverse square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the inverse square law to magnetic and electric fields. It highlights that while the inverse square law applies to electric fields from point charges, it does not hold for magnetic fields, as there are no magnetic monopoles. Participants note that using magnets is often more practical than electric charges due to the stability of magnetic fields and the challenges posed by electric charges, such as leakage and environmental factors. The conversation also touches on the experimental setup, suggesting that both electric and magnetic fields can be explored, but practical considerations often favor magnets. Overall, the choice between using magnetic or electric fields in experiments is influenced by stability and control issues.
superslow991
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Using magnetic field over electric field

Homework Equations


no equation needed

The Attempt at a Solution


THis may not make sense but did an experiment dealing with the inverse square law and we measured the magnetic field in this case. Want to know is there some type of difference between magnetic field and electric field where we would choose to use the magnetic field over the electric field? for the inverse square law?

[Note: Thread moved to general physics by a mentor]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the inverse square law depends on the configuration of the source(s) of the field, only if there is one magnet or a concentrated charge will it hold up
 
andrevdh said:
the inverse square law depends on the configuration of the source(s) of the field, only if there is one magnet or a concentrated charge will it hold up
Well we used 2 magnets but my teacher said we could perform the same experiment with just 2 charges and why were we not offered to use an electric fied than magnetic field in this case
 
electric charges are difficult to keep control over. they can easily leak away for instance if you come too close to the source spark over can occur. also if the humidity is high (as low as 60% relative humidity) even an insulator can conduct the charge away thereby weakening the source. magnets are quite stable and do not change that readily, so it is much easier to work with them rather than an electrically charged body.
 
  • Like
Likes superslow991
Only the monopole field follows the inverse square law. There are no magnetic monopoles so the magnetic field does not follow the inverse square law.
 
  • Like
Likes superslow991
could you maybe show us your results or a picture of your graph?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top