Electric potential at center of circular arc

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the center of a circular arc formed by an insulating rod with a uniform charge distribution. The problem involves understanding the relationship between charge, radius, and the angle subtended by the arc.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss dividing the total charge into small point charges and integrating to find the potential. Questions arise regarding the integration limits and the significance of the radius in the calculations. Some participants express confusion about the cancellation of terms in their equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying definitions such as linear charge density and exploring the implications of their integration limits. There is a recognition of the relationship between the charge distribution and the resulting potential, with some participants expressing satisfaction with their understanding while others continue to seek clarity on specific steps.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of previous assignments that may influence the understanding of integration limits. Participants are also considering the implications of the angle subtended by the arc on the calculations.

cyberstudent
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
An insulating rod of length l is bent into a circular arc of radius R that subtends an angle theta from the center of the circle. The rod has a charge Q ditributed uniformly along its length. Find the electric potential at the center of the circular arc.

Struggling with this problem.

I know that I have to divide the charge Q into many very small charges, essentially point charges, then sum them up (integration).

dV = dq/(4 Π Ε0 R)

Length of dq = ds
db = angle subtended by ds
dΒ=ds/R => ds = dBR

dq = λds => dq = λdBR

V = ∫ dq/(4 Π Ε0 R)

V = ∫ λdBR/(4 Π Ε0 R)

Now, this is where it all goes wrong for me.

I take out the constants V = λR/(4 Π Ε0 R) * ∫ dB
My Rs cancel out, which makes no sense.
The radius must be important in the calculation of the difference potential.

Notice also that I did not indicate the limits on the integration. In a similar problem which was done in a previous assignemnt to calculate the electric field at the center, the upper and lower limits were set to -B/2 and B/2, but I am not sure why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cyberstudent said:
The radius must be important in the calculation of the difference potential.

It is. Define λ

cyberstudent said:
Notice also that I did not indicate the limits on the integration. In a similar problem which was done in a previous assignemnt to calculate the electric field at the center, the upper and lower limits were set to -B/2 and B/2, but I am not sure why.
The limits would be -theta/2 to +theta/2. You have to integrate over the angle subtended by the arc. You could actually use any pair of limits that differ by theta.
 
Define λ

λ is the linear charge density.

The limits would be -theta/2 to +theta/2. You have to integrate over the angle subtended by the arc. You could actually use any pair of limits that differ by theta.

That actually makes senses to me. Thanks. Of course, you would want to integrate over the angle subtended by the arc. Would 0 and theta also be valid limits then?

So, I now have my limits, but I still end up with the same absurd problem of losing my R. What is the mistake. Is the equation wrong? Am I not taking out constants?

Θ/2
V = ∫ λdBR/(4 Π Ε0 R)
-Θ/2

Θ/2
V = λR/(4 Π Ε0 R) ∫ dB
-Θ/2


I uploaded a diagram to clarify the problem and my thought process.
 

Attachments

  • diagram_calculations.gif
    diagram_calculations.gif
    10.9 KB · Views: 4,065
cyberstudent said:
λ is the linear charge density.



That actually makes senses to me. Thanks. Of course, you would want to integrate over the angle subtended by the arc. Would 0 and theta also be valid limits then?

So, I now have my limits, but I still end up with the same absurd problem of losing my R. What is the mistake. Is the equation wrong? Am I not taking out constants?

Θ/2
V = ∫ λdBR/(4 Π Ε0 R)
-Θ/2

Θ/2
V = λR/(4 Π Ε0 R) ∫ dB
-Θ/2


I uploaded a diagram to clarify the problem and my thought process.
The limits of 0 and theta will work fine.
OK, you have defined λ. Now calculate λ.
 
I think I got it.

OK, you have defined λ. Now calculate λ.

You must think I'm a bit slow. :)

λ = Q/ΘR (Charge/divided by length of the arc)

I haven't lost my R after all!

Θ/2
V = ∫ λdBR/(4 Π Ε0 R)
-Θ/2

Θ/2
V = λR/(4 Π Ε0 R) ∫ dB
-Θ/2

Θ/2
V = λ/(4 Π Ε0) B ׀
- Θ/2

V = (λ/(4 Π Ε0)) * Θ

V = QΘ/((4 Π Ε0)ΘR)

V = Q/(4 Π Ε0 R)

Interestingly, the equation for the potential difference at the center of the circular arc is the same regardless of Θ.
Have I solved the problem or did I make another dumb mistake?
 
cyberstudent said:
You must think I'm a bit slow. :)

V = Q/(4 Π Ε0 R)

Interestingly, the equation for the potential difference at the center of the circular arc is the same regardless of Θ.
Have I solved the problem or did I make another dumb mistake?

Why would I think you are slow? You did what I asked you to do, jut not what I had expected you would do :smile:

Your answer is interesting, and it is correct. It also makes sense. Regardless of the arc length, all the charge is the same distance from the center of the circle. Potential is a scalar inversely porportional to the distance from the charge. No matter how you distribute that charge along the arc the answer will be the same.
 
sorry to dig up such an old post but i too had a problem like this and everything except how you went from

V = (λ/(4 Π Ε0)) * Θ

to

V = QΘ/((4 Π Ε0)ΘR)

makes sense... i realize that λ=Q/R but how come the Θ cancels out?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K