Electric potential at center of semicircle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential at the center of a semicircular thread with a uniform charge distribution. The charge Q is distributed along a length L, and the potential is defined to be zero at large distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between electric potential and electric field, with some questioning the use of variables and the integration process. There are attempts to express the potential in terms of different variables, and participants explore the implications of using charge density.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the need to justify steps taken in calculations. There is exploration of how to relate the radius to the length of the semicircle, and some participants express uncertainty about the integration process and variable usage.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the need to express results in terms of L rather than r, and there is confusion regarding the definitions and relationships between the variables involved. The assumption that a semicircle is a half-circle is confirmed, but there are discussions about the correct formulas for length and circumference.

toothpaste666
Messages
517
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


A total charge Q is uniformly distributed on a thread of length L. This thread forms a semicircle. what is the potential at the center? (assume V=0 at large distances)

Homework Equations



V = -∫Edl
E = kQ/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


V = - ∫Edr = -E∫dr = -Er = - kQr/r^2 = -kQ/r
is this correct? I am not sure if the sign should be negative
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E is a vector and it is not constant. Finding the electric field is more complicated, it is sufficient to calculate the potential here but that has a different formula.
Also, using r both for radius and for the length along the circle is confusing and leads to wrong results.
 
hmmm so would it be correct to say
V = ∫dV = k∫dQ/r = kQ/r because Q is constant?
 
The result is right but you'll have to justify the steps you used.
 
mfb said:
The result is right but you'll have to justify the steps you used.
Does this mean i have to plug something in for dQ?
 
The length should appear somewhere.

Oh, and I guess the final result should be expressed in terms of L instead of r as well I guess.
 
I think i can use arc length formula L = theta r to relate r and L. I am not sure how I can plug that into the equation for V. I think this doesn't seem like it should be a tough problem but I must be missing something obvious =[
 
This is not a tough problem. Yes you can use the arc length formula.

If a charge Q is uniformly distributed over a length L, what is the charge per length?
 
I think it would simply be Q/L so dQ in terms of the charge density would be dQ = λdL = (Q/L)dL

V = k∫dQ/r = k∫(Q/L)dL/r = kQL/Lr = kQ/r ??
 
  • #10
Looks fine. Now you just have to express r in terms of L.
The semicircle has a length of L.
 
  • #11
so since L = theta r then r = L/theta so the final step would be
kQ/r = kQtheta/L
but since they don't give me theta can I get away with doing this?
 
  • #12
toothpaste666 said:
they don't give me theta
toothpaste666 said:
This thread forms a semicircle
 
  • #13
assuming a semicircle is a half circle (forgive me if this is incorrect I am not 100 percent sure) then L would equal the perimeter or L = (pi/2)r^2
so r = sqrt(2L/pi) so it would be kQ/(sqrt(2L/pi))
 
  • #14
toothpaste666 said:
assuming a semicircle is a half circle (forgive me if this is incorrect I am not 100 percent sure)
Yes, semicircle just means half-circle

toothpaste666 said:
L = (pi/2)r^2
I think you're mixing up the area and circumference formulas. On the left side you have units of length but on the right side you have units of length squared.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666
  • #15
oops sorry L = 2(pi/2)r = pi r
so r = L/pi
so kQ/r = kQpi/L
 
  • #16
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: toothpaste666
  • #17
thanks guys
 
  • #18
i feel like i did something wrong. if my integral was k∫(Q/L)dL/r then wouldn't it be
k∫(Q/L)dL/r = kQ/r∫dL/L(because Q and r are constant) = kQ/r (ln(L)) ??
 
  • #19
or If i put everything in terms of L instead of r from the begining:
k∫((Q/L)dL)/(L/pi) = k∫piQdL/L^2 = kpiQ∫dL/L^2 = - kpiQ/L
so it would be negative?
 
  • #20
If you use L like this, you have to integrate over a different variable, like L' (or x, or whatever). The L in Q/L does not change in the integral.
 
  • #21
the L in r = L/pi changes? How would I have to set that up for it to be correct?
 
  • #22
No it does not change!
That's why it is better to use a different integration variable along the length of the semicircle, like x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
744
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K