Electric potential halfway between two equal but opposite charges

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of electric potential between two equal but opposite charges, specifically addressing why the electric potential is considered zero at the midpoint and the implications of this for a test charge placed there. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and exploratory reasoning regarding electric potential and field interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a positive charge can accelerate toward a negative charge if it starts with no potential energy at the midpoint.
  • Another participant draws an analogy with gravitational potential energy to illustrate the concept of potential energy being relative and dependent on the chosen reference point.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the zero potential is a matter of choice and that potential energy can be adjusted by adding a constant.
  • One participant notes that the electric field is the gradient of the potential, suggesting that the absolute value of potential is less important than how it changes with position.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that the electric field is zero at the midpoint, asserting that the test charge will still experience a force toward the negative charge.
  • A participant clarifies that the electric field is not zero at the midpoint and that the gradient of potential ensures that the electric field is present.
  • A participant expresses confusion and seeks further clarification on the relationship between electric field and potential in this context.
  • Another participant advises that it is preferable to start a new thread for new questions rather than reviving old ones.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of electric potential being zero at the midpoint and the relationship between electric field and potential. There is no consensus on the interpretation of these concepts, and confusion remains among some participants.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding that potential energy is relative and can be defined differently based on chosen reference points. The discussion also touches on the nuances of electric field behavior in relation to potential changes.

LightningB0LT
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm having a hard time understanding why the electric potential halfway between two equal but opposite charges is 0. If I put a positive charge halfway between a 5 mC charge and a -5 mC charge, it will accelerate toward the negative charge, but how can it do this if it starts with no potential energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LightningB0LT said:
how can it do this if it starts with no potential energy?

Consider an analogy with gravity instead of electric force. Let the gravitational potential energy of an object be zero at the Earth's surface (the usual U = mgh formula). Dig a hole in the ground. Hold an object over the hole, exactly in line with the Earth's surface around the hole. What is its potential energy there? Now, let it go. What happens to it?
 
It has potential energy. As it approaches the negative charge its potential energy decreases, becomes more negative. So it has more energy in the middle than when it gets closer.
The fact that it is zero is just a matter of choice. The variation is what matters.
You can make it 10 J if you want. Just add a constant to the potential energy.
 
nasu said:
The fact that it is zero is just a matter of choice.

What's the first thing you do in a potential situation?

*SPOILER*

Set your zero.
Whether its U_{g} or U_{q}, you need to set your zero, if you call the hot plate +10V instead of +5, that makes your low V plate at 0, or you could call the high V plate 0 and the other one -10V. Tomatoe Tomahto.
 
Thanks, that makes it a lot easier to understand.
 
Glad to help :)
 
nasu has stated this, but I think it needs to be reemphasized here. The "force" or the electric field is the gradient of the potential. In other words, it is how much the potential changes with position. So it isn't the absolute value at every field point that is important, but rather, how the value changes as the position changes.

You could be in a situation where you have a potential of 100V, but if it is 100V all over the place, the charge will still not experience a force. The gradient will be zero there and thus, no net electric field/force.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor, beamie564 and Delta2
I want to comment on ZapperZ's last lines, i.e. the field will be zero where change in potential is zero. True this is what the electric intensity and potential gradient relation says. But for the current question, the electric field is nowhere zero between the charges. The test charge midway will have the tendency to move towards negative charge. So if E≠0 at the midpoint, then ΔV≠0, Still a lot of confusion for me. Please provide more help.
 
Zahid Iftikhar said:
I want to comment on ZapperZ's last lines, i.e. the field will be zero where change in potential is zero. True this is what the electric intensity and potential gradient relation says. But for the current question, the electric field is nowhere zero between the charges. The test charge midway will have the tendency to move towards negative charge. So if E≠0 at the midpoint, then ΔV≠0, Still a lot of confusion for me. Please provide more help.

1. You are replying to a thread that was last active in 2014.

2. I was emphasizing to the OP the general concept that the electric field has nothing to do with the value of the potential, but rather the GRADIENT of the potential. I bought up a counter example where the potential is not zero, but a constant everywhere. Here, even if the potential isn't zero, you can still get a zero electric field. It wasn't an explanation for the situation in the problem.

3. I never stated that the E-field is zero at the midpoint. In fact, the explanation that it is the gradient of the potential rather than the potential itself that is relevant assures that E-field is NOT zero at the midpoint.

Zz.
 
  • #10
Thank u ZapperZ for the kind reply.
Actually I consult PhysicsForum when any difficulty in explaining a physical concept arises and search old posts and mostly find stuff sufficient to my requirement. Sometime if I need more help and the thread is open I add my question. That is why I posted my own query in this thread.
This question has real confusion, at least for me. But I will not share my view unless I know the policy of the PF whether to start a new thread of my own with this question. Please guide me on this.
Regards
Zahid
 
  • #11
Zahid Iftikhar said:
But I will not share my view unless I know the policy of the PF whether to start a new thread of my own with this question. Please guide me on this

It is always preferred and wise to start your own thread. Reviving dead/old posts is definitely not encouraged.
In fact many of the older threads get locked to stop that occurring :smile:

Regards
Dave
 
  • #12
Sure I will... Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
974
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K