Electric Potential of a Cylinder using Poisson's Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric potential of a homogeneously charged, infinitely long, straight wire of finite radius using Poisson's equation. Participants explore the implications of the problem's setup and the mathematical approach required to solve it.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the separation of the solution into two regions based on the radius, questioning how to apply boundary conditions and continuity of potential between the regions. There is also mention of the mathematical nature of the problem and the challenges of integrating with respect to the defined regions.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants offering insights on the need to split the general solution for different regions and the importance of continuity. Some have expressed frustration with the mathematical aspects, while others have suggested that the problem can be approached through indefinite integration and consideration of charge density in different regions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific boundary conditions and the implications of charge homogeneity up to a certain radius. The discussion reflects on the mathematical complexities involved in applying Poisson's equation to this scenario.

Trifis
Messages
165
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider a homogeneously charged, infinitely long, straight wire of finite radius R. Determine the potential [itex]\phi[/itex](r) of the wire for r ≤ R and for r ≥ R. You must use the Poisson-Equation!

Homework Equations


Δφ(r) = -ρ(r)/ε ⇔ [itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex][itex]\frac{∂}{∂r}[/itex](r[itex]\frac{∂φ}{∂r}[/itex]) + [itex]\frac{1}{r^{2}}[/itex][itex]\frac{∂^{2}φ}{∂θ^{2}}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{∂^{2}φ}{∂z^{2}}[/itex] = -ρ[itex]_{0}[/itex]/ε

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok first of all, I'm really frustrated, cause this problem is a two-minutes work using the Gauss's Law and I'm stuck for an hour:mad:
This problem should be really trivial, cause the partial DE could be reduced due to symmetry (the electric field must have only radial dependency) to the following ordinary DE :
[itex]\frac{1}{r}[/itex][itex]\frac{d}{dr}[/itex](r[itex]\frac{dφ}{dr}[/itex]) = -ρ[itex]_{0}[/itex]/ε , with the solution : φ(r) = -[itex]\frac{ρ [itex]_{0}[/itex]r^{2}}{4ε}[/itex] + C[itex]_{1}[/itex]ln(r) + C[itex]_{2}[/itex]
The problem is I've no idea how I could calculate C[itex]_{1}[/itex] and C[itex]_{2}[/itex] for the two areas r ≤ R and r ≥ R ! I've thought of integrating with upper and lower bounds instead of indefinitely but to no avail...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What boundary conditions are you using? First separate the solution into a solution of the two regions. Then, you know that the potential is continuous going between the two regions.
 
My problem is purely of mathematical nature. At what stage of the calculation should I separate the regions (after I've found the general solution of the DE?) and how I'm supposed to? Using Dirac's function maybe? But then again that is already done during the derivation of Poisson's law so it wouldn't help to go back. As already written, I've tried to put boundaries to the to integrals (e.g. from r' to R for the first and from R to r' for the second region or something like that) but it didn't help too much or at least that's what I understood...

There are no specific boundary conditions given! Just homogenity of charge til r=R.

Continuity is a good point! though I've never used that before, it could still lead me somewhere...
 
What I mean is that your general solution now needs to be split into two different regions. For example, for r<R then the natural log can't be there because it's undefined at 0 in that region. Continuity will be helpful too.

I don't know, if you know what you're doing (and after this problem you'll know what you're doing) you may be able to argue that the Poisson solution takes just about as long as the Gaussian formulation. Additionally, Poisson solutions hold in more situations than Gaussian -- I've never seen in infinite charged cylinder in real life.
 
Ok I've solved that, thanks for the tips...

As a matter of fact indefinite integration was the only possible approach to this problem. The trick in order to "separate" the regions is simply to consider ρ=ρ[itex]_{0}[/itex] on the inside and ρ=0 on the outside. Two of the emerging constants can be eliminated/calculated by the continuity of the potential and by the mere fact that in the centre of the sphere the potential must be finite. The other two constants cannot be found without any boundary conditions (e.g. φ(R)=0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
771
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K