Electrical Machine - Shunt DC Motor Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the analysis of an 8.25 kW shunt DC motor with a terminal voltage of 300 V and an armature resistance of 0.25 ohms. Key calculations include determining the motor's speed at rated load (1276.36 rpm) and the no-load speed, as well as evaluating copper losses (225 W) and mechanical losses (525 W) at rated load. The efficiency of the motor is derived from the input power (calculated as Vdc * (Ia + If)) and output power, while adjustments to the field resistance (Radj) are discussed to maintain speed under varying terminal voltages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of shunt DC motor operation and characteristics
  • Familiarity with electrical engineering concepts such as back EMF and torque
  • Knowledge of power loss calculations in electrical machines
  • Proficiency in using formulas for efficiency and speed calculations in DC motors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of DC motor speed control and the role of field resistance
  • Learn about the impact of armature and field current on torque in DC motors
  • Explore methods for calculating efficiency in electrical machines
  • Investigate the effects of varying terminal voltage on motor performance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying motor control systems, and professionals involved in the design and optimization of DC motors will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
SK97 said:
would i do that for both voltages? use the back emf generated to get the torques?
Yes. Isn't mechanical power Eb*Ia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cnh1995 said:
Yes. Isn't mechanical power Eb*Ia?

I think my confusion is lying in what i exactly equate at which step.

For the first step of the solution do i use the equation T = Ea * Ia / Wm

For both 300V and 260V to get the torques for both?

Then i would need to relate that to field current I(f).

So where does mechanical power come into play?

Sorry for taking this long to understand.
 
  • #33
SK97 said:
So where does mechanical power come into play?
To get the magnitudes of torques and the torque ratio, mechanical power is needed.
SK97 said:
For the first step of the solution do i use the equation T = Ea * Ia / Wm
Yes, where Ea*Ia is the mechanical power.
 
  • #34
cnh1995 said:
To get the magnitudes of torques and the torque ratio, mechanical power is needed.

Yes, where Ea*Ia is the mechanical power.
Okay so applying that method;

After i get the torques in the two cases is it correct for me to do this:

T(300V) / T (260V) = I (f) 1 / I (f) 2

where I (f) 1 is 5A and I (f) 2 is unknown.

Also is the Wm (mechanical speed in radians) the same for both volatges?
 
  • #35
SK97 said:
Also is the Wm (mechanical speed in radians) the same for both volatges?
Yes, isn't that mentioned in the problem?
 
  • #36
cnh1995 said:
Yes, isn't that mentioned in the problem?
Yes so after doing the method i posted earlier, I am still obtaining an answer of 20 ohms.

So something I'm doing must not be right, but i can't understand what?
 
  • #37
SK97 said:
Yes so after doing the method i posted earlier, I am still obtaining an answer of 20 ohms.

So something I'm doing must not be right, but i can't understand what?
Post your working. Maybe there is some arithmatic mistake.
 
  • #38
cnh1995 said:
Post your working. Maybe there is some arithmatic mistake.
ok here it is:

Ea for 260V: Vdc - IaRa

260 - 30(0.25) = 252.5V

Ea for 300V as calculated before is 292.5V

T (260V) = 252.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/60) = 65.65 Nm
T (300V) = 292.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/ 60) = 56.67 Nm

now : T (300V) / T (260) = I (f) 1 / I(f) 2

65.65 / 56.67 = 5/ I(f)2
1.158 = 5 / I (f)2

I (f) 2 = 5 / 1.158
I ( f) 2 = 4.32 A

then I (f) = Vdc / Rf + Radj

so: 4.32 = 260 / 40 + Radj

Radj = 20.24 ohms
 
  • #39
SK97 said:
ok here it is:

Ea for 260V: Vdc - IaRa

260 - 30(0.25) = 252.5V

Ea for 300V as calculated before is 292.5V

T (260V) = 252.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/60) = 65.65 Nm
T (300V) = 292.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/ 60) = 56.67 Nm

now : T (300V) / T (260) = I (f) 1 / I(f) 2

65.65 / 56.67 = 5/ I(f)2
1.158 = 5 / I (f)2

I (f) 2 = 5 / 1.158
I ( f) 2 = 4.32 A

then I (f) = Vdc / Rf + Radj

so: 4.32 = 260 / 40 + Radj

Radj = 20.24 ohms
Your calculations look correct to me.
When you used terminal voltages (300V and 260V) instead of back emfs, you got Radj=20 ohms and the new value for Radj=20.24 ohms, which is very close to the previous value. This is because the ratio of terminal voltages (260/300) is almost equal to the ratio of back emfs (252.5/292.5).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SK97
  • #40
cnh1995 said:
Your calculations look correct to me.
When you used terminal voltages (300V and 260V) instead of back emfs, you got Radj=20 ohms and the new value for Radj=20.24 ohms, which is very close to the previous value. This is because the ratio of terminal voltages (260/300) is almost equal to the ratio of back emfs (252.5/292.5).
So it's just the nature of the question that made both values close to each other?

All in all thank you so much for your thorough help in this problem, I can't tell you how much I appreciate you and am thankful for helping me understand this topic clearer.
 
  • #41
SK97 said:
So it's just the nature of the question that made both values close to each other?
I think so.

To summarize,
the motor develops 65 Nm torque with 300V supply voltage and 30A armature current, and the speed is 1276 rpm. If you reduce the terminal voltage to 260V with the load unchanged, the field current will reduce and the speed will also decrease in order to allow for more current to flow in the armature, so as to maintain the torque at 65Nm. If you want to bring the speed back to 1276 rpm and armature current to 30A, you'll have to reduce the load torque from 65 Nm to 56 Nm and increase Radj from 20 ohm to 20.24 ohm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SK97
  • #42
cnh1995 said:
I think so.

To summarize,
the motor develops 65 Nm torque with 300V supply voltage and 30A armature current, and the speed is 1276 rpm. If you reduce the terminal voltage to 260V with the load unchanged, the field current will reduce and the speed will also decrease in order to allow for more current to flow in the armature, so as to maintain the torque at 65Nm. If you want to bring the speed back to 1276 rpm and armature current to 30A, you'll have to reduce the load torque from 65 Nm to 56 Nm and increase Radj from 20 ohm to 20.24 ohm.
Yeah that seems to make sense.

Thank you again for all your hard work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K