Engineering Electrical Machine - Shunt DC Motor Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem with an 8.25 kW shunt DC motor, focusing on calculations related to speed, losses, and efficiency. Key points include determining the motor's speed at rated load and no load, calculating copper and mechanical losses, and finding the motor's efficiency. Participants clarify the relationship between back EMF, armature current, and terminal voltage to derive necessary values. The final challenge involves adjusting the field resistance to maintain speed when terminal voltage changes, leading to a conclusion that the required adjustable resistance remains the same as initially set. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding motor parameters and their interrelations for effective problem-solving.
  • #31
SK97 said:
would i do that for both voltages? use the back emf generated to get the torques?
Yes. Isn't mechanical power Eb*Ia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cnh1995 said:
Yes. Isn't mechanical power Eb*Ia?

I think my confusion is lying in what i exactly equate at which step.

For the first step of the solution do i use the equation T = Ea * Ia / Wm

For both 300V and 260V to get the torques for both?

Then i would need to relate that to field current I(f).

So where does mechanical power come into play?

Sorry for taking this long to understand.
 
  • #33
SK97 said:
So where does mechanical power come into play?
To get the magnitudes of torques and the torque ratio, mechanical power is needed.
SK97 said:
For the first step of the solution do i use the equation T = Ea * Ia / Wm
Yes, where Ea*Ia is the mechanical power.
 
  • #34
cnh1995 said:
To get the magnitudes of torques and the torque ratio, mechanical power is needed.

Yes, where Ea*Ia is the mechanical power.
Okay so applying that method;

After i get the torques in the two cases is it correct for me to do this:

T(300V) / T (260V) = I (f) 1 / I (f) 2

where I (f) 1 is 5A and I (f) 2 is unknown.

Also is the Wm (mechanical speed in radians) the same for both volatges?
 
  • #35
SK97 said:
Also is the Wm (mechanical speed in radians) the same for both volatges?
Yes, isn't that mentioned in the problem?
 
  • #36
cnh1995 said:
Yes, isn't that mentioned in the problem?
Yes so after doing the method i posted earlier, I am still obtaining an answer of 20 ohms.

So something I'm doing must not be right, but i can't understand what?
 
  • #37
SK97 said:
Yes so after doing the method i posted earlier, I am still obtaining an answer of 20 ohms.

So something I'm doing must not be right, but i can't understand what?
Post your working. Maybe there is some arithmatic mistake.
 
  • #38
cnh1995 said:
Post your working. Maybe there is some arithmatic mistake.
ok here it is:

Ea for 260V: Vdc - IaRa

260 - 30(0.25) = 252.5V

Ea for 300V as calculated before is 292.5V

T (260V) = 252.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/60) = 65.65 Nm
T (300V) = 292.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/ 60) = 56.67 Nm

now : T (300V) / T (260) = I (f) 1 / I(f) 2

65.65 / 56.67 = 5/ I(f)2
1.158 = 5 / I (f)2

I (f) 2 = 5 / 1.158
I ( f) 2 = 4.32 A

then I (f) = Vdc / Rf + Radj

so: 4.32 = 260 / 40 + Radj

Radj = 20.24 ohms
 
  • #39
SK97 said:
ok here it is:

Ea for 260V: Vdc - IaRa

260 - 30(0.25) = 252.5V

Ea for 300V as calculated before is 292.5V

T (260V) = 252.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/60) = 65.65 Nm
T (300V) = 292.5 (30) / (1276.36) (2pi/ 60) = 56.67 Nm

now : T (300V) / T (260) = I (f) 1 / I(f) 2

65.65 / 56.67 = 5/ I(f)2
1.158 = 5 / I (f)2

I (f) 2 = 5 / 1.158
I ( f) 2 = 4.32 A

then I (f) = Vdc / Rf + Radj

so: 4.32 = 260 / 40 + Radj

Radj = 20.24 ohms
Your calculations look correct to me.
When you used terminal voltages (300V and 260V) instead of back emfs, you got Radj=20 ohms and the new value for Radj=20.24 ohms, which is very close to the previous value. This is because the ratio of terminal voltages (260/300) is almost equal to the ratio of back emfs (252.5/292.5).
 
  • Like
Likes SK97
  • #40
cnh1995 said:
Your calculations look correct to me.
When you used terminal voltages (300V and 260V) instead of back emfs, you got Radj=20 ohms and the new value for Radj=20.24 ohms, which is very close to the previous value. This is because the ratio of terminal voltages (260/300) is almost equal to the ratio of back emfs (252.5/292.5).
So it's just the nature of the question that made both values close to each other?

All in all thank you so much for your thorough help in this problem, I can't tell you how much I appreciate you and am thankful for helping me understand this topic clearer.
 
  • #41
SK97 said:
So it's just the nature of the question that made both values close to each other?
I think so.

To summarize,
the motor develops 65 Nm torque with 300V supply voltage and 30A armature current, and the speed is 1276 rpm. If you reduce the terminal voltage to 260V with the load unchanged, the field current will reduce and the speed will also decrease in order to allow for more current to flow in the armature, so as to maintain the torque at 65Nm. If you want to bring the speed back to 1276 rpm and armature current to 30A, you'll have to reduce the load torque from 65 Nm to 56 Nm and increase Radj from 20 ohm to 20.24 ohm.
 
  • Like
Likes SK97
  • #42
cnh1995 said:
I think so.

To summarize,
the motor develops 65 Nm torque with 300V supply voltage and 30A armature current, and the speed is 1276 rpm. If you reduce the terminal voltage to 260V with the load unchanged, the field current will reduce and the speed will also decrease in order to allow for more current to flow in the armature, so as to maintain the torque at 65Nm. If you want to bring the speed back to 1276 rpm and armature current to 30A, you'll have to reduce the load torque from 65 Nm to 56 Nm and increase Radj from 20 ohm to 20.24 ohm.
Yeah that seems to make sense.

Thank you again for all your hard work!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K