Electricity contradiction? Which one is right

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of work done in bringing a charge to a point with a specific electric potential, specifically 20 V. Participants are exploring the implications of the signs associated with work and energy in the context of electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between work done and electric potential, questioning why the work is considered positive in this scenario despite previous teachings suggesting it should be negative. They explore analogies with physical systems, such as pushing a block, to clarify their understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on the nature of work in electric fields. Some suggest that the sign of work depends on the context of the forces involved, while others express confusion regarding the consistency of the textbook explanations. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the nuances of work done by electric forces versus work done on a charge, and how these concepts relate to the signs of potential and charge. The original poster references a contradiction with textbook information, indicating a need for clarity on these concepts.

x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


The potential at a point is 20 V. Calculate the work done in bringing a charge of 0.5 C to this point.


Homework Equations


V = Ee / q
W = -Ee

The Attempt at a Solution


Ee = 10 J

W = -10 J

But the answer is 10 J. Why isn't it negative? It's contradicting what it taught me to do in previous questions.

The way I see it, work is being done on the system, therefore the work has to be negative (thats what it says in my book)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about this. If you pushed a block on a flat surface with some friction, the work done would be the force X the distance and be positive. How is this different from when you bring a positive charge at infinity to a point where the voltage potential is +20 v, that is whether the work is positive or negative?
 
barryj said:
Think about this. If you pushed a block on a flat surface with some friction, the work done would be the force X the distance and be positive. How is this different from when you bring a positive charge at infinity to a point where the voltage potential is +20 v, that is whether the work is positive or negative?

Well, it makes sense when you put it like that because now the way I see it is:

point 1 = infinity
point 2 = 20 V

----------------------------> force vector
So if you're going against the force vector, then cos180 = -1

So W = -Ee cos theta

W = +Ee

Is this correct? The answer is 10 J

So I guess the book is wrong, because you can't just say work is negative when force is being done against the system, since system is all about relativity
 
One has to be careful about work being done by something or on something. When you compress a spring the force and direction are the same and you being the pusher does work on the spring. When you slowly release the compression the force is still toward the spring but the directioon is against the force and work is being done ON the pusher, yes?
 
x86 said:
But the answer is 10 J. Why isn't it negative? It's contradicting what it taught me to do in previous questions.

You have to be careful with these types of questions regarding the sign. Sometimes you might be asked for the work done by the electric force acting on the charge. At other times, you might be asked for the work done by you in moving the charge such that the charge does not accelerate. These works will have opposite sign. Of couse, you also must take into account the sign of the charge and the sign of the change in potential ΔV.
 
Why would it be negative? Both charges are positive so they wouldn't they? If you started at infinity you would have to push the positive charge to the +20V potential wouldn't you? It would be like compressing a spring.
 
x86 said:
So I guess the book is wrong, because you can't just say work is negative when force is being done against the system,
Can you post the section of the book that you consider has misled you?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K