Electricity Demand and Hypothesis Tests

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard_R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
Richard_R
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I am currently investigating domestic electricity use and whether or not the average (mean) per person use is affected by the number of people living in a household.

I have monitoring data from several hundred households with household occupancies ranging from 1 to 6 people.

My null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in the per person use of electricity for different household occupancy rates (although the per household use would obviously be higher as the occupancy rate increased in this case). The alternative hypothesis would be that there is a difference between the per person electricity use regardless of the household occupancy (at a guess the per person use is probably less as occupancy increases).

Now I know how to calculate the test statistic to test for a significant difference between TWO sample means, however in this instance I have 6 sample means! So what I would like to know is if there is a way to simultaneously test for significant differences across all 6 data sets, or do I need to compare them in pairs of data sets? (Given the number of possible pairs between the 6 data sets this could take some time...)

Any help appreciated. :)

-Rob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you want to do is calculate:
\chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^6{\frac{(Mean_i-Model_i)^2}{\sigma_i^2}}
where Mean(i)is the mean of your data for all of the households with i people, sigma(i) is the standard deviation of your data for all of the households with i people, and Model(i) is the prediction of your null hypothesis. Chi_Squared then tells you the probability that your null hypothesis is correct and your data happened by chance.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Back
Top