Electricity, Direction of Charge Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quiz problem involving three charges arranged in an equilateral triangle, where the participant lost points for not providing x and y components for one of the forces. The participant calculated the electric force on charge q3 but was marked incorrect for not separating the force from charge q2 into components. It is emphasized that all vector quantities must specify both magnitude and direction to avoid losing points, even if one component is zero. The conversation highlights the importance of clearly defining vector components in physics problems. The participant plans to address this grading issue with the teacher.
Bound
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Some background: This was a quiz I recently had in which I lost a few points for missing an "x & y component" for one of the directions.

My thinking is that because the problem was not actually set up with a specified order of charges there are a few different answers you could get.

I intend to bring this up with the teacher, but thought I'd see what you guys have to say as well.

Homework Statement


Three charges are arranged in the shape of an equilateral triangle. (Note- no diagram is given)

The charge magnitudes are as follows:
q1=+4*10-6C, q2=-6.5*10-6C, q3=+2.1*10-6C

The distance between each charge is 2m

Calculate the electric force on q3.

Homework Equations


F = (kq1q2) / d2

The Attempt at a Solution



I set my triangle up as: (see attached picture)

Calculated force of 1 on 3:
F = .0189 N

X-component of F13:
Fx=(.0189)(sin30)
=.00945 N

Y-component of F13:
Fy=(.0189)(cos30)
=.0163676801 N

*Marked Correct*

Calculated force of 2 on 3:
F = -.0307125 N

*Marked incorrect for not separating into x & y components*

Would this not be correct though? The way I set my triangle up has 2 on a straight horizontal line across from 3!

My further work is just adding up all of the components of everything for a final answer of:
Net Force on q3 = .0268 N @ 37.6deg SofW

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • paint.jpg
    paint.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 406
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bound said:
Some background: This was a quiz I recently had in which I lost a few points for missing an "x & y component" for one of the directions.

My thinking is that because the problem was not actually set up with a specified order of charges there are a few different answers you could get.

I intend to bring this up with the teacher, but thought I'd see what you guys have to say as well.

Homework Statement


Three charges are arranged in the shape of an equilateral triangle. (Note- no diagram is given)

The charge magnitudes are as follows:
q1=+4*10-6C, q2=-6.5*10-6C, q3=+2.1*10-6C

The distance between each charge is 2m

Calculate the electric force on q3.


Homework Equations


F = (kq1q2) / d2


The Attempt at a Solution



I set my triangle up as: (see attached picture)

Calculated force of 1 on 3:
F = .0189 N

X-component of F13:
Fx=(.0189)(sin30)
=.00945 N

Y-component of F13:
Fy=(.0189)(cos30)
=.0163676801 N

*Marked Correct*

Calculated force of 2 on 3:
F = -.0307125 N

*Marked incorrect for not separating into x & y components*

Would this not be correct though? The way I set my triangle up has 2 on a straight horizontal line across from 3!

My further work is just adding up all of the components of everything for a final answer of:
Net Force on q3 = .0268 N @ 37.6deg SofW

Thanks for any help!

You must always specify units and direction for any vector quantities, otherwise points will be deducted. It's not enough to assume that unspecified directions imply a direction along the positive x-axis (or Easterly), unless you so specify in your work.
 
So would I just have had to specify xx.xx N [0deg. E] to be correct?

Or are you implying that there is some arbitrary angle in which that force can be broken into a y-component, if so I don't have the first idea on how to find that angle.
 
Bound said:
So would I just have had to specify xx.xx N [0deg. E] to be correct?
That would work.
Or are you implying that there is some arbitrary angle in which that force can be broken into a y-component, if so I don't have the first idea on how to find that angle.
All planar vectors have two components, even if one of them happens to have a zero magnitude. When one of the components happens to be zero you can drop it so long as you've specified the direction for the remaining component. It would not be incorrect to include the zero magnitude component as, for example, 0.00 N [North].

In your work for the other forces you explicitly broke them out as Fx and Fy. You could have done the same for F23 and written

For F23:
Fx = xx.xx N
Fy = 0.00 N
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top