Electrodynamics and Classical Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of simultaneously studying electrodynamics and classical mechanics in preparation for an exam. The original poster, lacking formal education in electrodynamics, purchased 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' by D.J. Griffiths but was advised that this text is more advanced than necessary for their needs. It was concluded that Halliday/Resnick-level electrodynamics is sufficient for the exam, and the poster's current understanding of vector calculus is crucial for success in both subjects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts such as divergence, gradient, and curl.
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics principles as outlined in Halliday/Resnick.
  • Basic knowledge of electrostatics and electrodynamics.
  • Ability to manage study time effectively for multiple subjects.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Halliday/Resnick-level electrodynamics to align with exam requirements.
  • Review vector calculus to strengthen understanding of relevant concepts.
  • Practice problem-solving in both electrodynamics and classical mechanics.
  • Explore supplementary resources or textbooks that bridge the gap between introductory and advanced topics.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, particularly those aiming for the Physics Olympiad, as well as anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of electrodynamics and classical mechanics.

Ujjwal Basumatary
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am preparing for an exam which requires me to solve problems in electrodynamics and electrostatics problems along with classical mechanics and geometrical optics problems. The concern is that I do not have electrodynamics in my course in school so I have to study it completely on my own. I bought 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' by D.J. Griffiths but before I begin studying sincerely for the exam, I want to ask if it is possible to simultaneously study electrodynamics with classical mechanics. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course it is possible. The real question is if you can handle it and do well in both. This depends on what you define as doing well, how deep you need to go, how much time you have, and your aptitude for the subjects. It really is not something that can be answered by strangers on an internet forum.
 
Orodruin said:
Of course it is possible. The real question is if you can handle it and do well in both. This depends on what you define as doing well, how deep you need to go, how much time you have, and your aptitude for the subjects. It really is not something that can be answered by strangers on an internet forum.
I have scored well in the practice tests for the mechanics exams and am doing fine at the moment. I started learning about div, gradient and curl when this question popped in my mind. I am willing to work hard to become a better physicist :)
 
If six weeks ago you were just starting to learn vector calc and introductory E&M, I think it's extremely likely that you are going too fast to learn the material in any depth.

I read War and Peace in twenty minutes. It's about Russia.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If six weeks ago you were just starting to learn vector calc and introductory E&M, I think it's extremely likely that you are going too fast to learn the material in any depth.

I read War and Peace in twenty minutes. It's about Russia.
Unfortunately, that is the problem. The exam I'm taking, which is due this November is intended for high school juniors, but I don't have any EM in my course this year. I'm having to learn it completely by myself.
 
Is this for the Physics Olympiad? (I suspect it is, based on your previous posts.) If so, does it really require Griffiths-level E&M (upper-level undergraduate), as opposed to Halliday/Resnick- or Young/Freedman-level (first-year undergraduate)?
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
Is this for the Physics Olympiad? (I suspect it is, based on your previous posts.) If so, does it really require Griffiths-level E&M (upper-level undergraduate), as opposed to Halliday/Resnick- or Young/Freedman-level (first-year undergraduate)?
It requires Halliday/Resnick level electrodynamics.
 
Then Griffiths is above the level you want. In the US at least, students who use Griffiths have already taken a course on the level of Halliday/Resnick.
 
Ujjwal Basumatary said:
I am preparing for an exam which requires me to solve problems in electrodynamics and electrostatics problems along with classical mechanics and geometrical optics problems. The concern is that I do not have electrodynamics in my course in school so I have to study it completely on my own. I bought 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' by D.J. Griffiths but before I begin studying sincerely for the exam, I want to ask if it is possible to simultaneously study electrodynamics with classical mechanics. Thank you.

Ujjwal Basumatary said:
It requires Halliday/Resnick level electrodynamics.

Ujjwal Basumatary said:
I have scored well in the practice tests for the mechanics exams and am doing fine at the moment. I started learning about div, gradient and curl when this question popped in my mind. I am willing to work hard to become a better physicist :)

Based on that last quote, I think you are using a bazooka to kill a mosquito.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
745
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K