Electrodynamics and Classical Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of simultaneously studying electrodynamics and classical mechanics in preparation for an exam. Participants explore the challenges of self-studying electrodynamics, particularly when the exam is intended for high school juniors and requires knowledge at a specific level.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the ability to study electrodynamics alongside classical mechanics, questioning whether it is manageable given their current knowledge and time constraints.
  • Another participant suggests that while it is possible to study both subjects, the real challenge lies in the individual's capacity to handle the material effectively.
  • A participant mentions their success in practice tests for mechanics and their willingness to work hard, indicating a positive attitude towards learning.
  • Concerns are raised about the pace of learning, with one participant suggesting that the original poster may be moving too quickly to grasp the material in depth.
  • There is a question regarding the level of electrodynamics required for the exam, with references made to different textbooks and their corresponding difficulty levels.
  • Another participant points out that Griffiths' textbook may be too advanced for the exam's requirements, suggesting that a more introductory text would be more appropriate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of studying Griffiths' text for the exam, with some agreeing that it may be too advanced while others emphasize the importance of the individual's study habits and aptitude. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to studying both subjects simultaneously.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference varying levels of difficulty in textbooks and the specific requirements of the exam, indicating a lack of consensus on the necessary depth of knowledge for effective preparation.

Ujjwal Basumatary
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am preparing for an exam which requires me to solve problems in electrodynamics and electrostatics problems along with classical mechanics and geometrical optics problems. The concern is that I do not have electrodynamics in my course in school so I have to study it completely on my own. I bought 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' by D.J. Griffiths but before I begin studying sincerely for the exam, I want to ask if it is possible to simultaneously study electrodynamics with classical mechanics. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course it is possible. The real question is if you can handle it and do well in both. This depends on what you define as doing well, how deep you need to go, how much time you have, and your aptitude for the subjects. It really is not something that can be answered by strangers on an internet forum.
 
Orodruin said:
Of course it is possible. The real question is if you can handle it and do well in both. This depends on what you define as doing well, how deep you need to go, how much time you have, and your aptitude for the subjects. It really is not something that can be answered by strangers on an internet forum.
I have scored well in the practice tests for the mechanics exams and am doing fine at the moment. I started learning about div, gradient and curl when this question popped in my mind. I am willing to work hard to become a better physicist :)
 
If six weeks ago you were just starting to learn vector calc and introductory E&M, I think it's extremely likely that you are going too fast to learn the material in any depth.

I read War and Peace in twenty minutes. It's about Russia.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If six weeks ago you were just starting to learn vector calc and introductory E&M, I think it's extremely likely that you are going too fast to learn the material in any depth.

I read War and Peace in twenty minutes. It's about Russia.
Unfortunately, that is the problem. The exam I'm taking, which is due this November is intended for high school juniors, but I don't have any EM in my course this year. I'm having to learn it completely by myself.
 
Is this for the Physics Olympiad? (I suspect it is, based on your previous posts.) If so, does it really require Griffiths-level E&M (upper-level undergraduate), as opposed to Halliday/Resnick- or Young/Freedman-level (first-year undergraduate)?
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
Is this for the Physics Olympiad? (I suspect it is, based on your previous posts.) If so, does it really require Griffiths-level E&M (upper-level undergraduate), as opposed to Halliday/Resnick- or Young/Freedman-level (first-year undergraduate)?
It requires Halliday/Resnick level electrodynamics.
 
Then Griffiths is above the level you want. In the US at least, students who use Griffiths have already taken a course on the level of Halliday/Resnick.
 
Ujjwal Basumatary said:
I am preparing for an exam which requires me to solve problems in electrodynamics and electrostatics problems along with classical mechanics and geometrical optics problems. The concern is that I do not have electrodynamics in my course in school so I have to study it completely on my own. I bought 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' by D.J. Griffiths but before I begin studying sincerely for the exam, I want to ask if it is possible to simultaneously study electrodynamics with classical mechanics. Thank you.

Ujjwal Basumatary said:
It requires Halliday/Resnick level electrodynamics.

Ujjwal Basumatary said:
I have scored well in the practice tests for the mechanics exams and am doing fine at the moment. I started learning about div, gradient and curl when this question popped in my mind. I am willing to work hard to become a better physicist :)

Based on that last quote, I think you are using a bazooka to kill a mosquito.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
937
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K