Electromagnet Polarity Switching for Reversed Motion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences in design and functionality between traditional solenoids and linear motors, particularly in the context of reversing motion through polarity switching. Participants explore the mechanisms that allow linear motors to operate in both directions while traditional solenoids typically do not, focusing on applications in projects like garage automation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that traditional solenoids cannot reverse direction without a permanent magnet or controlled polarity field winding, while linear motors can switch directions with AC or DC.
  • Another participant describes linear motors as using permanent magnet fields with conventional armature and brushes, suggesting a difference in design from solenoids.
  • Some participants propose that reversing the direction of a solenoid could be achieved with a three-phase system, questioning whether this would allow for bidirectional operation with a ferrous non-magnetic plunger.
  • There is mention of induction motors and how they operate by inducing current in a ferrous armature, with a focus on the role of copper or aluminum inlays for efficiency.
  • A later reply discusses the efficiency of a reversible solenoid with a plain steel plunger compared to one with copper or aluminum inlays, indicating that eddy currents play a role in the operation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms and designs of solenoids versus linear motors, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of bidirectional solenoids or the necessity of specific materials for efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific configurations and assumptions about the materials used in solenoids and linear motors, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

mattwkeller
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Why do some electromagnetic designs allow for motion reversal with reversed polarity?
I am trying to understand the differences in design between a traditional solenoid with a ferrous plunger vs linear motors that use either induction or permanent magnets. From my understanding, a traditional solenoid, whether DC or AC, cannot fire in both directions with polarity switching since the magnetic field in the plunger is induced into it.

In the case of linear motors however, it seems that they all can be fired in both directions, AC or DC. Now this would make sense to me if all linear motors were permanent magnet designs, but some linear motors use induction with copper or aluminum bars in the plunger or non coil piece. This seems to agree with the function of electric motors too, both induction and PMAC motors can flip directions.

So my question is, what sets traditional solenoids and linear motors apart to allow for one to reverse the Lorentz force and flip directions when polarity is flipped while the other can't? In a garage project application, I would like the ability of the linear motor to switch directions, but do not want to use a complex plunger with permanent magnets or induction copper/aluminum inlays.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The linear motors I am familiar with are simply permanent magnet fields with conventional armature and brushes that turn a lead screw. The lead screw moves the plunger in and out.
-
Solenoids usually are configured to draw the plunger in. Specialized designs may have multiple coils configure to pull from either end.
-
Have you googled any of this? There is bound to plenty of info out there along with animation, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
To reverse the direction of a solenoid requires a permanent magnet, or a controlled polarity field winding.

To reverse the direction of a motor requires the same, or a multi-phase AC power source that can then control the direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
Averagesupernova said:
The linear motors I am familiar with are simply permanent magnet fields with conventional armature and brushes that turn a lead screw. The lead screw moves the plunger in and out.
-
Solenoids usually are configured to draw the plunger in. Specialized designs may have multiple coils configure to pull from either end.
-
Have you googled any of this? There is bound to plenty of info out there along with animation, etc.
I am referring to non mechanical linear motors, similar to coil guns or induction rails on roller coasters. I thought I understood the concept in solenoids until I found out about induction linear motors without permanent magnets, which seem to counter the operation of a one-way solenoid.
 
Baluncore said:
To reverse the direction of a solenoid requires a permanent magnet, or a controlled polarity field winding.

To reverse the direction of a motor requires the same, or a multi-phase AC power source that can then control the direction.
So could a three phase solenoid with a coil for each phase be bidirectional for a ferrous non-magnetic plunger?
 
mattwkeller said:
So could a three phase solenoid with a coil for each phase be bidirectional for a ferrous non-magnetic plunger?
That is how an induction motor works.
A current is induced in the "ferrous non-magnetic" armature by the travelling virtual field. The direction is reversed by reversing the phase direction.
 
Baluncore said:
That is how an induction motor works.
A current is induced in the "ferrous non-magnetic" armature by the travelling virtual field. The direction is reversed by reversing the phase direction.

Understood. The difference in that case is the rotor has copper inlays or aluminum bars arranged on the steel shaft. In this case would the reversible solenoid need those in order to reverse? Would it still reverse but not be as efficient with a plain steel plunger?
 
mattwkeller said:
Would it still reverse but not be as efficient with a plain steel plunger?
Yes. The moving field induces eddy currents in the surface of the iron, that then drag the steel in the direction of the cyclic field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K