I Electromagnetic Absorption in the Ocean

AI Thread Summary
Communicating with underwater vessels is severely limited due to electromagnetic (EM) absorption at extreme depths, rendering GPS ineffective. As depth increases, higher frequencies are absorbed first, making low-frequency communication necessary but reducing data transmission rates. While GPS cannot relay positions from submerged vessels, alternative navigation methods exist, though they are less effective for rescue operations. The challenges of rescuing a disabled submarine, especially at depths like 2.5 miles, highlight the limitations of current technology and the reliance on scanning sonar for locating such vessels. Ultimately, EM communication is impractical underwater, emphasizing the need for specialized sonar systems for search and rescue efforts.
RobbyQ
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
The recent rescue operation of a sub in the ocean made me wonder how difficult it is to communicate with underwater vessels. Is it that all parts of the EM spectrum gets absorbed at extreme depths that things like GPS is not possible. I wondered what wavelengths of the spectrum were absorbed first eg at a certain depth all visible must be absorbed as the the sub is in complete darkness.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The attenuation length is proportional to wavelength - i.e. 1 wavelength down you are down a factor of x, two wavelengths down x2 and so on. So you want to go to very low frequencies.

Unfortionately, the maximum data transmission rate is proportional to frequency. So the deeper you go, the less communication you have with the outside world.

GPS odes not work on submerged vessels. There are other navigation methods. (And people were able to suvvessfully navigate ships before GPS - honest!)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Klystron, russ_watters, fresh_42 and 2 others
Vanadium 50 said:
GPS odes not work on submerged vessels. There are other navigation methods. (And people were able to suvvessfully navigate ships before GPS - honest!)
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking more about GPS position being relayed to the outside world (not so much their own navigation) in terms of the rescuers being able to locate them. But I see this isn't possible from your information.
 
"Rescuing" a disabled submarine is more Hollywood than reality. It's happened a handful of times, like the USS Squalus. This was in the 30's and amazingly more than half the crew survived.

If this is about the Titanic submersible, the problem isn't that we don't know where it is. The problem is that we know where it is. It's in 2-1/2 miles of water. Now what do we do? Can you swim 2-1/2 miles? On one breath?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
"Rescuing" a disabled submarine is more Hollywood than reality. It's happened a handful of times, like the USS Squalus. This was in the 30's and amazingly more than half the crew survived.

If this is about the Titanic submersible, the problem isn't that we don't know where it is. The problem is that we know where it is. It's in 2-1/2 miles of water. Now what do we do? Can you swim 2-1/2 miles? On one breath?
Not suggesting anyone could swim to that depth or any Hollywood connotations. And it's not just the depth it's the area. Let's stick to the original question about locating it and EM degradation.
 
RobbyQ said:
Let's stick to the original question about locating it and EM degradation.
EM is useless underwater, so scanning sonar is the best bet for finding the lost sub. If there were an attack sub in the area, they could likely search the bottom with their scanning sonar, although I have no idea what kind of resolution they might have with that system. The Seawolf class subs would be able to go down to 490m max, so that's still a long way from the bottom. I also don't know how good their scanning sonar resolution is when looking way down below the sub like that.

 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top