I assume I am making a mistake here. Can you please help me learn how to fix them?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In electrodynamics, the gauge transformations are:

[tex]\vec{A} \rightarrow \vec{A} + \vec{\nabla}\lambda[/tex]

[tex]V \rightarrow V - \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\lambda[/tex]

These leave the electric and magnetic fields unchanged. The electromagnetic energy density is proportional to:

[tex] u \propto (E^2 + B^2)[/tex]

So the energy density should be gauge invariant. A guage transformation shouldn't even shift it by a constant.

However, the energy density can also be written in terms of the potentials and charge distributions as:

[tex] u = \frac{1}{2}(\rho V + \vec{j} \cdot \vec{A})[/tex]

If I let [itex]\lambda[/itex] = e^(-r^2), then V is unchanged, and A is just changed by a radial field which vanishes at infinity. Here, the energy density IS changed, and not by a constant amount either ... it changes by an amountdependingon j. What gives?

Even weirder, is some textbooks start with the potentials form toderivethe fields form. I don't see any place they fix any gauge in doing such derivation. Please help.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Electromagnetic energy is not Gauge invariant?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**