Electromagnetic induction problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the induced voltage in a circular loop with a resistance of 0.5 Ω/m placed in a magnetic field of 2 Teslas, where the radius increases at a rate of 0.5 m/s. The induced voltage at time t=10 seconds is determined using both the Lorentz force method and Faraday's law, yielding a final result of 31.416 Volts. The user expresses confusion regarding the application of the second method without a specified initial radius, questioning its impact on the calculation of magnetic flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction
  • Knowledge of Lorentz force and its application in magnetic fields
  • Basic calculus for solving equations involving changing variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Faraday's law in varying magnetic fields
  • Learn about the Lorentz force and its implications in electromagnetic systems
  • Explore the relationship between resistance, voltage, and current in circuits
  • Investigate the impact of initial conditions on electromagnetic induction problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving problems related to electromagnetic induction and circuit analysis.

kontejnjer
Messages
71
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


A circular loop with resistance 0.5 [tex]\Omega[/tex] per meter of length is placed in a homogeneous magnetic field of induction B=2 Teslas. The magnetic field is perpendicular with the surface of the loop, as shown in the picture (image1). The radius of the loop is increasing according to the equation [tex]r(t)=vt[/tex] with [tex]v=0.5 m/s[/tex]. What is the induced voltage at time [tex]t=10 s[/tex]?

Homework Equations


U=Change in magnetic flux/change in time

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, it seems to me there are two ways of solving this problem: the Lorentz force method and Faraday's law method. I'll start with the Lorentz force method.

If we consider the fact that every part of the loop expands at the same rate, we can use the right hand rule for Lorentz force and find that the velocity of each part of the wire (and hence every electron) is perpendicular to the magnetic field, so:
[tex]Fm=Q*v*B[/tex]
At the same time, an electric field is generated by the stationary protons that is trying to pull the electrons back into place:
[tex]Fe=E*Q[/tex]
In the equilibrium position, the total force on the electrons will be zero:
[tex]EQ=Q*v*B[/tex]
And from this we get:
[tex]E=B*v[/tex]
Since:
[tex]E=U/d[/tex]
We obtain:
[tex]U=B*v*d[/tex]
Where d in this case is the circumference of the loop, so we plug that in and get:
[tex]U=2*r*B*v*\pi[/tex]
Since the radius changes with time, we plug that in as well:
[tex]U=2*v*t*B*v*\pi[/tex]
Since everything here is known, we put in all the values and get:
[tex]U=31.416 Volts[/tex]

Which is the correct answer according to the book (although I haven't really figured out for what purpose do I need the resistance per length value...).

The trouble I'm having is getting the other method to work properly.
I'm guessing the loop has an original non-zero size, so I'm going to use [tex]r_{0}[/tex] as that. At time [tex]t=0[/tex] the surface of the loop is:
[tex]S_{0}=r_{0}^{2}*\pi[/tex]
However, with time the radius gets larger:
[tex]r=r_{0}+vt[/tex]
Hence the surface gets larger as well:
[tex]S=r^{2}*\pi[/tex]
Since the surface of the loop changes, so does the magnetic flux:
[tex]\Delta\Phi=B*(S-S_{0})[/tex]
Or:
[tex]\Delta\Phi=B*((r_{0}+vt)^{2}-r_{0}^{2})*\pi[/tex]
Solving this as a difference of two squares:
[tex]\Delta\Phi=B*((r_{0}+vt-r_{0})*(r_{0}+vt+r_{0}))*\pi[/tex]
[tex]\Delta\Phi=B*vt*(2*r_{0}+vt)*\pi[/tex]

So this is the part I don't follow: how am I supposed to use this method if the original radius is not specified? If I set it to be zero at time [tex]t=0[/tex] then I get half of the correct value. Am I missing something here?

P.S. Sorry if I made any latex errors, it took me quite a while to write all of this.

EDIT: Forgot to put the image in the attachment, think it works now.
 

Attachments

  • image1.JPG
    image1.JPG
    14.3 KB · Views: 500
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K