Electromagnetic Theory: Do these Fields Solve the maxwell equations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around whether specific electric and magnetic fields, represented as \(\vec{E} = E_0 \cos(kx - \omega t) \vec{e}_1\) and \(\vec{B} = B_0 \cos(kx - \omega t) \vec{e}_1\), satisfy Maxwell's equations. Participants are exploring the implications of these fields in the context of electromagnetic wave propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to differentiate the fields to verify if they satisfy Maxwell's equations. There is a focus on the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields and their propagation direction. Questions arise about the implications of the fields being parallel and the conditions for them to be perpendicular to the wave vector.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the relationships between the fields and their propagation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to check the satisfaction of Maxwell's equations, and there is acknowledgment of the conditions under which the fields may or may not represent valid electromagnetic waves.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to satisfy four equations from Maxwell's framework and the implications of the fields being parallel to the propagation direction.

Raioneru
Messages
83
Reaction score
3
1. Consider the fields:

[tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = E0 * cos(kx-wt)[tex]\vec{e}[/tex]1

[tex]\vec{B}[/tex] = B0 * cos(kx-wt)[tex]\vec{e}[/tex]1

Do these fields solve the maxwell equations? if so, what do they describe?




2. Homework Equations


[tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = E0 * cos(kx-wt)[tex]\vec{e}[/tex]1

[tex]\vec{B}[/tex] = B0 * cos(kx-wt)[tex]\vec{e}[/tex]1




The Attempt at a Solution



if these functions holds for the maxwell equations then,
[tex]\nabla[/tex].[tex]\vec{B}[/tex]=0
[tex]\nabla[/tex].[tex]\vec{E}[/tex]=0

that is

[tex]\nabla[/tex].[tex]\vec{B}[/tex]=-[tex]\vec{B}[/tex]0.[tex]\vec{K}[/tex]*Sin(kx-wt)

this equation is equal to zero only if and only if B0.K = 0 that means, they are perpendicular vectors. that is the constraint.

I guess the [tex]\vec{e}[/tex] means that the wave propagates only in the x direction? since e1=<1,0,0>

hum, I really can't tell if that's the appropriate answer, so could you help please ?
thanks in advance

so the question what do they describe, I wrote the propagation of the electromagnetic wave in the x-direction as time increases.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try peforming the differntitaion and see what you get

also shouldn;t you have 4 equations to satisfy?
 
Yes I have 4 equations to satisfy, I'll try the differentiation and I'll get back at you
 
however what you said is correct, the cos term represents propagation in the x dir'n,

so as you have said
[tex]\vec{B}_0 = B_0(1,0,0)[/tex]
[tex]\vec{E}_0 = E_0(1,0,0)[/tex]

how do these relate to the differentiation and formula you have given?
 
the problem is asking for: what do these functions describe?

so I figured since these are wave functions, they must be describing the propagation of either the electric field or the magnetic field. and since vector e1 is "attached" it means, the propagation of the electric wave, and the magnetic wave in the x-direction
 
you need to check whther they satisfy Maxwell's equations

as the elctric field, magnetic field & propagation direction are all parallel, i doubt this is the case
 
are you sure? because I thought that in this case, the function holds if and only if:

vector k . vector E0 is 0, which means the electric field is perpendicular to the propagation
 
have a look at how you have written the fields in your first post

propagation direction is x, E field only has e_1 component which i assume is in the x dir'n and B field only has e_1 component which i assume is also in the x dir'n
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K