Electromagnetic wave equation not invariant under galilean trans.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electromagnetic wave equation, represented as (d²ψ)/(dx²) + (d²ψ)/(dy²) + (d²ψ)/(dz²) - (1/c²)(d²ψ)/(dt²) = 0, is proven to be non-invariant under Galilean transformation. The transformation equations are t' = t, x' = x - vt, y' = y, z' = z. The analysis involves applying the chain rule for partial derivatives, particularly focusing on the x-component while treating y, z, and t as constants. The conclusion is that the equation does not retain its form for observers moving at a constant velocity in the x-direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave equations
  • Familiarity with Galilean transformations
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and the chain rule
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics and wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz transformations on wave equations
  • Explore the relationship between electromagnetic waves and special relativity
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of the wave equation in different reference frames
  • Investigate the role of the speed of light (c) in wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, classical mechanics, and the foundations of special relativity.

bfusco
Messages
126
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that the electromagnetic wave equation: 
(d^2ψ)/(dx^2) + (d^2ψ)/dy^2) + (d^2ψ)/(dz^2) − (1/c^2) * [(d^2ψ)/(dt^2)]= 0 is NOT invariant under Galilean transformation. (i.e., the equation does NOT have the same form for a moving observer moving at speed of, say, v in the x direction).

*note: all the "d"s in this equation are the partial derivatives.


Homework Equations


galilean transformation:
t'=t, x'=x-vt, y'=y, z'=z

The Attempt at a Solution


-from what i understand to solve this involves the chain rule for partial derivatives.
-looking at the equation i can't help but jump to something with the gradient of ∇ψ, but i don't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The y,z,t components in the equation just stay the same, you can ignore them. You just have to change the x-component.
Hint: It will get an additional t-component afterwards.
 
d/dx(dψ/dx' * dx'/dt + dψ/dt' * dt'/d(something)) ?
 
bfusco said:
d/dx(dψ/dx' * dx'/dt + dψ/dt' * dt'/d(something)) ?

wait is it d/dx(dψ/dx' * dx'/dx + dψ/dt' * dt'/dx), which equals d/dx(dψ/dx' * 1 + dψ/dt' * 0)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K