Electromagnetic Wave: Explaining Proportions for Visualization

AI Thread Summary
An electromagnetic wave can be visualized as alternating electric and magnetic fields, which are best represented through vector arrows that change in length or thickness over time to indicate field strength. While photons are often described as massless particles, they can also be conceptualized as moving particles that exhibit wave-like behavior, such as diffraction. The discussion highlights that electrons demonstrate wave properties, suggesting a connection between mass and wave behavior in particles. Accurate visualizations of electromagnetic waves should consider the full volume of the fields rather than limiting them to two perpendicular planes. Overall, understanding electromagnetic waves requires a balance between particle and wave perspectives.
pikapika!
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain what an electromagnetic wave would look like. I've heard it being decribed as a massless particle but i don't think that is an accurate description.

I am asking about the proportions of the wave so that i can visualize it in my mind.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it's not like you can study an E-M wave under a microscope. An alternating electric and magnetic field may be the best you can do.

http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/waves_particles/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/waves2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like to think of them as photons with very very little mass, that move really fast, and all objects travel in a wave so they are photons that tavel in wave.

It has been proved that electrons are waves through diffraction and such, and their mass has also been calculated, also moving electrons (electricity) excite various things, by this logic I say that photons are moving particles that behave as waves because they diffract, have an even smaller mass, and excite other things, such as electrons or the thingies in our eyes.
 
Laser Jock said:
http://imagers.gsfc.nasa.gov/ems/waves2.html

The picture at the bottom of that page would be more accurate if

1. the vector arrows stayed in the same locations, but got longer and shorter (or thicker/thinner or darker/lighter, depending on what you're using to represent the strength of the field) as time passes.

2. the vector arrows filled the entire volume instead of existing only in two perpendicular planes. (but that would make for a really messy-looking diagram!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top