Electromagnetism: Finding Electric Field of non Uniform Charged Rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at the end of a non-uniformly charged rod, specifically a thin rod of length 100 cm with a total charge of 37 nC, where the line density is proportional to the square of the distance from one end. The participants derive the line density formula λ(x) = kx² and determine that k equals 111 nC/m³. They utilize Coulomb's law to find the electric field E at point A, ultimately concluding that the electric field is approximately 9.98E10 N/C after correcting for units.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of charge density concepts
  • Basic understanding of units in physics, particularly in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charge distributions using integration techniques
  • Learn about the implications of non-uniform charge distributions on electric fields
  • Explore the relationship between electric fields and forces on charged objects
  • Review the concepts of permittivity and its role in electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by non-uniform charge distributions.

sky.flower1234
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the question:

Thin rod AB has length l=100 cm and total charge q=37 nC that is distributed in such a way that its line density ? is proportional to the square of the distance from the end A, i.e. ?(x) =kx^2. Determine electric field E at the end A of the rod.

? stands for Lambda, sorry I do not understand TeX. I know that I need to integrate SOMETHING. How I do that I am not sure. Here are a couple of questions:

Homework Equations



- Can I assume that at 1m: (37nC)/1m=k(1^2) to find k? (or is k just 8.97E9?)
- Do I use the formula E=lambda/((2)(pi)(epsilson-nought)(x)) because this is a cylinder?

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I have so far:

solve for k at 1m and see that it equals 37 nC (should I just convert that to C?)

input lambda into the equation and do an integral so you get: k(x^2)/((2)(pi)(epsilon-nought)(x)) from A (0) to B (1 m). From this I got that the integral is k(x^2)/((4)(pi)(epsilon-nought)). This is where would end the problem and put in my values.

I really just want to understand the problem, obviously there is something I am not getting.

Thanks in advance.

PS I know there is this exact question (I did my research on this problem before I came here). I didn't understand the explanation there so please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did the math and I got that the electric field equals 9.99E2 (this is converting nC to C)

what would my units be? C/m?
 
Welcome to PF, olivia.belli3!

(Have a λ :wink:)

olivia.belli3 said:
- Can I assume that at 1m: (37nC)/1m=k(1^2) to find k? (or is k just 8.97E9?)

Let's start here and try to find k.

Your line density λ defines how much charge is between x and x+dx measured from point A, where dx is a very small distance.
That is, the charge between x and x+dx is:
\lambda(x)dx = k x^2 dx

To find the total charge you need to calculate the integral of these charges over the length of the rod.
 
I set up my integral that q= the integral of kx^2 dx to get that q=(kx^3)/3
from A=0 to B=1.

this means that k=3Q or k=111 nC (Do I convert to C?)

Thanks for your reply :)
 
olivia.belli3 said:
I set up my integral that q= the integral of kx^2 dx to get that q=(kx^3)/3
from A=0 to B=1.

this means that k=3Q or k=111 nC (Do I convert to C?)

Thanks for your reply :)

Right! :smile:

No need to convert from nC to C unless you really want to. ;)
However, your unit is not quite right, since you have that the charge q (coulomb) equals your k times x3 divided by 3. So what should the unit of k be?


Now for the electric field at point A.
I'm not sure where you got your formula, but you should use the formula from Coulomb's law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law" ).

That is:
dE = \frac 1 {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {dQ} {r^2}
where dE is the small contribution of a small charge dQ=\lambda(x)dx at a distance r.

Can you apply this to your problem?
And integrate it over the length of the rod?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well in that case my K= 111 nC/m^3.

So I have Q, of course I can integrate over the length of the rod using dr from 0 to 1, but I'm stuck. Where does k come in? I'm a little lost . I'm assuming that you meant to put QQ on the top instead of dQ? In that case I would taket he charge from A (which is zero) then take the charge from B which would lead me to to the answer, but how do you do that?
 
E_A = \int_0^{AB} dE = \int_0^{AB} \frac 1 {4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac {\lambda(x)dx} {x^2}=\ ...
 
Last edited:
Okay, so I integrated that and put in that lambda=kx^2 (since we know K I am assuming this is okay). I'm assuming that AB=1m?

I got that the integral equals k(x)/((4)(pi)(epsilon-nought)) from 0 to AB which I would think would equal K/((4)(pi)(epsilon-nought)).
 
Good! :smile:
 
  • #10
so would my final answer be:

(111nC/m^3)(1m)/((4)(pi)(epsilon-nought)) to yield the electric field as: 9.99E10^11?
 
  • #11
sorry 9.98E10^11
 
  • #12
units would be nC/m^2
 
  • #13
olivia.belli3 said:
sorry 9.98E10^11

Yep! :smile:

(Now would be a good time to convert nC to C. :wink:)

olivia.belli3 said:
units would be nC/m^2

Uhh, no.
Did you take the unit of \epsilon_0 into account?

Btw, do you know how the electric field is related to the force it would exert on a charged object?
That might help you deduce the unit of the electric field.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Eek sorry! forgot about epsilon nought. The fnal units is N/C!

Thank you SO much!
I really appreciate you!
 
  • #15
Any time! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
776