Electromagnets Range: Comparing Neodymium & Electromagnets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the attraction between a neodymium magnet and an electromagnet, specifically focusing on how to calculate the maximum distance at which they can attract each other. The scope includes theoretical calculations, practical applications, and considerations of friction in the context of magnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to determine the maximum distance at which a neodymium magnet and an electromagnet can attract each other, given their respective forces.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for specific shapes and dimensions of the magnets and a defined threshold for attraction.
  • A participant suggests that the threshold of attraction is an arbitrary value and questions the background of the original poster.
  • There is a discussion about the complexity of magnet/electromagnet calculations, which depend on various factors such as shapes, angles, and distribution of magnetism.
  • One participant provides an equation for calculating the force between two magnets through air, but another challenges the validity of the inverse square law in this context.
  • A participant expresses frustration over the clarity of the discussion and seeks further clarification on how to find the force between two magnets across a distance.
  • There is a suggestion that the question may be better suited for a different section of the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the inverse square law to magnets, with some agreeing that the calculations are complex and others questioning the assumptions made in the discussion. The overall discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining the shapes and dimensions of the magnets, as well as the influence of friction on the calculations. There is also uncertainty regarding the appropriate equations to use and the factors that affect magnetic attraction.

Cocacolacan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Let's say I have a neodymium magnet with 20 lbs of force, and an electromagnet with 200 lbs of force. Is there a way I could figure out the maximum distance that they would attract each other?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You would have to specify the shapes and dimensions and specify a threshold for the attraction.
 
circular magnets, 2" diameter (both of them) and air is in between them, and what is the threshold of attraction?
 
Threshold of attraction is the very low number you arbitrarily pick to be zero attraction. Are you an EE student?
 
No I'm not, I will be studying to be a physicist or biomedical engineer next year though (going into college next year).

And I'm still not getting this threshold of attraction, have any links?
 
What do you mean the maximum distance they attract each other? The range is infinite. Do you mean when Fmag can overcome the friction of the magnet on the table?
 
okay, let's rephrase. So I have two permanent magnets, one is pulling 30 lbs and the other is pulling 20 lbs. There's a .5 coefficient of friction, and they're opposite poles. How would I figure out the distance at which the magnets would overcome the coefficient of friction and pull each other together?
 
No, I did not. I'm hoping my AP Physics teacher might have an answer, he is usually so busy, but now after the test he might be free.
 
As I understand it, magnet/electromagnet calculations can get extremely complicated, as they depend on the shapes of the poles, the angle they make with each other, the distribution of magnetism over the surface of the objects, and other things too. I believe there are some simplified scenarios for which you can get an orcder of magnitude approximation, as explained by the wiki article (google 'Force between two magnets'), but beyond that, you might have to resort to Finite Element Analysis, or something equivalent.
 
  • #10
Okay, I have an equation.

If you're going through air between the magnets,
the equation will be

F=Magnetic Permability constant*S1*S2/r2

That is, (4*pi)×10−7 N·A−2 times the strength of the pole of interest number one times the strength of the pole of interest number two divided by the distance that separates them squared.

You can put it onto a calculator, set R as X, and watch the force drop off into oblivion.

Hope this helps someone in the future.
 
  • #11
Cocacolacan said:
Okay, I have an equation.

If you're going through air between the magnets,
the equation will be

F=Magnetic Permability constant*S1*S2/r2

That is, (4*pi)×10−7 N·A−2 times the strength of the pole of interest number one times the strength of the pole of interest number two divided by the distance that separates them squared.

You can put it onto a calculator, set R as X, and watch the force drop off into oblivion.

Hope this helps someone in the future.

There is nothing clear about any of this. Magnets, for one, do not obey an inverse square law. And you've said nothing about this source of friction.
 
  • #12
Alright then, what do magnets follow? And wouldn't friction be something that would be dealt with later? As I would find a force on the graph that would equal the normal force of the magnet?

Does anyone know an answer to this question, it is driving me nuts. (How to find the force between two magnets across a distance that are interacting in air?)

The magnets are both circular, one is an electromagnet and the other is a permanent magnet.

Would this question be better in the physics section of the forum?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Phrak said:
There is nothing clear about any of this. Magnets, for one, do not obey an inverse square law. And you've said nothing about this source of friction.

agreed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
746
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K