Chemistry Electron Affinity: Adding Electrons to Valance Shells

Click For Summary
An electron enters the valence shell of an atom as it seeks to achieve a stable noble gas configuration, releasing energy in the process. This energy release occurs because the attractive forces from the positively charged nucleus outweigh the repulsive forces from existing electrons, allowing for the formation of a negative ion. In gases, this process often involves photon emission, while in liquids and solids, it may produce phonons instead. The polarizability of the electron shell also plays a role, as more easily polarizable atoms exhibit higher electron affinity. Overall, the dynamics of electron addition are influenced by atomic structure and environmental conditions.
SSG-E
Messages
60
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
How does an electron add up(enters) in the valance shell of an atom? Why is energy released when an electron adds up in the valance shell of an isolated atom.
Relevant Equations
X(g) + e = X(g) = electron affinity
I think that an electron adds up in the valance shell of an atom because an atom tends to achieve the nearest noble gas configuration. But I don't understand how and why electron enters the valance shell. Energy is released when an electron adds up in the valance shell. But why is energy released. I think because photon are emitted. Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SSG-E said:
Homework Statement:: How does an electron add up(enters) in the valance shell of an atom? Why is energy released when an electron adds up in the valance shell of an isolated atom.
Relevant Equations:: X(g) + e = X(g) = electron affinity

I think that an electron adds up in the valance shell of an atom because an atom tends to achieve the nearest noble gas configuration. But I don't understand how and why electron enters the valance shell. Energy is released when an electron adds up in the valance shell. But why is energy released. I think because photon are emitted. Is it correct?
During electron capture in gas, photon emission (or to be exact, a series of photons) is typical. Initially electron enters highly excited orbit, which decay nearly immediately. For liquids and solids, phonons (lattice vibrations, or simply heat) are likely to be produced instead of photons.

The energy during formation of negative ion is released (in case of chlorine and lithium, but not for berillium or nitrogen, for example) because the atom electric field is not a point-source. In some electron shell configurations, repulsion from already orbiting electrons may be weaker than attraction from the positively charged nucleus. Because electrons in average (again, not for all atoms) will be farther away from added electron than nucleus. Another factor is polarizability of electron shell. Easily polarizable atoms tends to have higher electron affinity (release more energy during formation of negative ion) - because added electron "push away" existing electrons, reducing the mutual repulsion. This trend is complicated by the effect of atomic radius though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DifferentialGalois and SSG-E
trurle said:
During electron capture in gas, photon emission (or to be exact, a series of photons) is typical. Initially electron enters highly excited orbit, which decay nearly immediately. For liquids and solids, phonons (lattice vibrations, or simply heat) are likely to be produced instead of photons.

The energy during formation of negative ion is released (in case of chlorine and lithium, but not for berillium or nitrogen, for example) because the atom electric field is not a point-source. In some electron shell configurations, repulsion from already orbiting electrons may be weaker than attraction from the positively charged nucleus. Because electrons in average (again, not for all atoms) will be farther away from added electron than nucleus. Another factor is polarizability of electron shell. Easily polarizable atoms tends to have higher electron affinity (release more energy during formation of negative ion) - because added electron "push away" existing electrons, reducing the mutual repulsion. This trend is complicated by the effect of atomic radius though.
If added electron "push away" existing electrons then doesn't it mean that mutual repulsion is increased?
 
SSG-E said:
If added electron "push away" existing electrons then doesn't it mean that mutual repulsion is increased?
If you mean repulsion between existing electrons, then yes. Just this increase of repulsion must be smaller than attraction to the additional electron in negative ion, for negative ion to form.
 
trurle said:
If you mean repulsion between existing electrons, then yes. Just this increase of repulsion must be smaller than attraction to the additional electron in negative ion, for negative ion to form.
you mean attraction of nucleus to additional electron?
 
SSG-E said:
you mean attraction of nucleus to additional electron?
Yes.
 
There are only few atoms which will bind an additional electron in the gas phase, e.g. O + e -> O-. In these cases, the extra electron is bound because the other electrons in the valence (not valance) shell are not efficiently shielding the positive nuclear charge. But most ions relevant to chemistry are stabilized by either the crystal lattice or by hydration (in solution).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K